Senator Elon Musk Called a ‘Traitor’ Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don’t Want a Car Built By An ‘A**hole’
Senator Elon Musk Called a ‘Traitor’ Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don’t Want a Car Built By An ‘A**hole’

Senator Elon Musk Called a ‘Traitor’ Gets Rid of His Tesla: Don’t Want a Car Built By An ‘A**hole’

What a misleading and poorly written headline.
I've never heard of the site Mediaite before. I didn't click the link, but plenty of AI slop sites are popping up and headlines like this are a good way to spot them.
EDIT: apparently the sites been around for a bit, and this seems to be a one off headline issue. The credited writer appears to have several articles without issues apparent at first glance. Another article says "White House attorney" but it's an attorney that's acting as a liaison. Maybe just a nitpick. Some sensationalist headlines. Same as I've seen elsewhere so nothing too egregious.
Mediaite has been around for 15 years https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediaite
Its owned by Daniel Abrams, the guy who created Live PD and its spiritual successor, On Patrol: Live.
Such a strange sentence. Makes you "garden path" (reanalyze the syntax after already being deeper into the structure). Minimally need a "that" after "Senator".
Though it's uncommon usage, so that's actually a tick against it potentially being AI generated.
You mean 'who', right? Senators are (usually bad) people so let's not treat them like objects.
Wait, I read the article and the headline is pretty much on point? What am I missing?
"Senator Elon Musk" is ambiguous phrasing. Obviously, what is meant is "Senator [that] Elon Musk", but it could also have been calling Aparthiedman himself a senator.
Elon Musk isn't a Senator. The title as written reads that way by default.
A
that
shoved in the middle would fix that.This sounds like Elon is a Senator and was called a traitor; when it was actually Musk calling a Senator a traitor.
Try: