USB gets simpler with new speed-focused labeling system replacing technical jargon
USB gets simpler with new speed-focused labeling system replacing technical jargon

USB gets simpler with new speed-focused labeling system replacing technical jargon

USB gets simpler with new speed-focused labeling system replacing technical jargon
USB gets simpler with new speed-focused labeling system replacing technical jargon
Thank fuck, a simple and clear marking that an average user can understand! I assume displayport compatible ports will still have that symbol, which is fine. Soon I'll be and to price out laptops that will work with a docking station without needing to read the damn manuals!
Thank fuck, a simple and clear marking that an average user can understand!
Next thing you know - all the hardware producers just start using some new standard they've collectively conceived. Because "simple and clear" is bad for their business.
It's actually different and better as the previous naming scheme was actually horrendous (trying to explain it to customers was a nightmare).
Cause previously if you wanted to figure out what speed of USB port you were getting you'd have to look up the table because me telling you that a port was USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 doesn't tell you jack shit.
Can you see how cursed this is for non-tech savvy people? Absolutely terrible.
Thankfully now the new naming scheme will be:
USB +
So the xkcd meme actually isn't relevant here.
Edit:
Revised grammar in the first sentence
The only thing changing here is the way cables are going to be labeled, the tech itself is staying exactly the same.
And on top of that, the author was generally correct for most situations, but usb (and especially usb c) truly has replaced a ton of separate connectors with a single standard. And it's very likely to continue to replace even more as time goes on
Huh? That's not at all how it would be in this instance. They're updating branding guidelines within an existing standard, not creating a new standard.
General rule:
The longer the product's name, the more bullshit you get.
USB 3.2 Gen 2x2
There are too many standards. Letās make a new one so we can consolidate them all.
There are now N + 1
standards.
This isn't a new standard. It's changing the naming conventions to make sense.
I'm still trying to find a good beard trimmer and electric toothbrush that charge with USB-C.
These are the only gadgets i have left that aren't charged with USB-C.
Fucking finally
What is high-speed USB suppose to be? No speed just for charging?
It's USB2, so either for charging or simpler devices that don't need USB3 (Like keyboards).
Edit: Federation issue? I swear there wasn't an existing reply when I responded.
Thanks!
No thanks. I'll wait for USB to develop their own writing and language first. They will get there one day.
90% of USB cables are 480Mbps and it's not even included. This will be useless.
That would be USB 2.0 and is pretty safe to assume that all USB ports and cables support this (If you can find a USB 1.0 or 1.1 port I'll be impressed). Why bother with a 480Mbps logo if it's the default minimum?
I thought the G number meant how many Gbās I could store in the cable
Isnāt that naming like a few years old? I already have a cable with 40 gbps 240 W on it
Yes. They broke the news on this branding guidelines change in 2022.
It's unclear why it's making the headlines again now - perhaps they started enforcing it somehow (although I'm unsure how that would even work) at the beginning of the year?
Usually what's called simpler as opposed to techy ways makes things, in fact, loads of crap more complex.
Couldn't give a fuck about speed labelling, how about wattage?
Mate, you don't even need to read the article, you just need to look at the pictures.
Wattage is part of the branding guidelines.
So I was curious because these new logos drop the wattage. From the one of the links to another pcworld article they have an image with the new logo but both the wattage and the speed. https://www.pcworld.com/article/2572128/an-updated-usb-logo-will-now-mark-the-fastest-docking-stations.html If all they did was change the shape of the logo thatās total garbage.
Boy howdy, I sure can't wait for 99.9% of all manufacturers on Earth to completely ignore this as well, and keep selling devices and cables that are completely unlabeled.
I mean, you arenāt wrong. Good luck trying to get Apple to put a label on anything.
But they'll still sell you a $180 USB C cable that's no different than one you can get for $75 and has all of it's labels.
Pick a different scapegoat; Apple's one of the better ones in this area
Stuff that's spec compliant has to follow the rules, non-spec compliant stuff can obviously do whatever, so yeah the cheap cables off ebay or amazon won't use the right logos.