Brazil Supreme Court panel unanimously upholds judge's decision to block X nationwide

Will it stop people from claiming it was a single judge being political and arbitrary? Certainly not.

Doesn't matter. The morons that follow musk already have a mindset of us vs them. All of Brazil is they whether one judge or a Supreme Court. Trump was found guilty by a jury co-selected by his own lawyers. But they were rigged against him. Even the lawyers probably. It doesn't matter.
- Even the lawyers probably
  That's what happens when you're on your 15th-string team because you keep firing and/or not paying people.

I wonder why EU is dragging their feet for so long, when Xitter clearly doesn't comply with regulation.
They've been giving warnings, but nothing else yet?
Also it kind of pisses me off, when public organisations and politicians that claim to defend democracy still use Xitter.
They are using and helping a platform that clearly has as a goal to undermine democracy.

Because opposition parties generally have their groups in there, which would cause political backlash and distance the supporters that still use it. Not that banning social networks abusing their privilege through hidden moderation and promotion and selling their user's data so propagandist know who and how to target shouldn't be done, but right know it would be done under the counter-chants of "repression" in the particular cold war 2.0 state of affairs of the world today, and that's very politically taxing.
- Private companies, especially global ones, have too much power. Isn't it kinda fucked up how a company can overrule laws in multiple countries all over the world, just due to how strong their presence is?

And nothing of value was lost.

How about the last scrap of pretense at democratic rule of law? Just because someone you do not like is on the receiving end, you should not applaud the authoritarian government.
- The Supreme Court is upholding the rule of law. If Musk refuses to take action on the massive propaganda and disinformation campaigns that are rampant on his platform and lead to a fascist (like a literal fascist who praised the military dictatorship and openly said it's only mistake was not to torture enough) getting elected, banning it shows that the democracy is still defensive and able to protect itself.
  We can't let tech monopolies just ignore any democratic rule and do whatever they want.
- Care to expand on this?
  Genuinely asking how Elon Musk unilaterally defying a unanimous court order is losing the “last scrap of pretense at democratic rule of law.” Seems like more of the same old oligarchy games like it always has been.
- It's pretty simple: did Elon design a legal representative as asked by the judge?
  He could have avoided this, but he thought he was above the law, and guess what? He's not.
- Man you right wingers are a very annoying bunch, always claiming censorship and loss of democracy while applauding the actual wannabe dictators doing gold medal deserving mental gymnastics to justify antidemocratic actions
- america has her own supreme court problems to figure out before anyone starts weeping about brazil being mean to elon fucking musk
- Nice bait
- Phew, I thought I was the only one here lol. This whole situation has me wondering what Brazil is trying to do that they're so afraid will be talked about on X.

Read starlink refuses to block it in Brazil, now I'm curious if that gets banned or somehow blocked although I can't imagine how.

The most they can really do is block payments, but even then, plenty of people would have access to foreign currency or bitcoin, so it wouldn't be that effective. Elon's also the kind of guy to start giving it away for free just to piss off Brazil's government more.
- They can revoke Starlinks license to operate within the country; then issue arrest warrants for its operators.
  The US has an extradition treaty with Brazil.
- They can shut down the ground stations in Brazil, but they can't block the laser links. They could also try to jam the signals, but SpaceX now has years of experience working around jamming in a war zone.
"He added that individuals or businesses that are found to still be accessing X by using virtual private networks (VPNs) could be fined R$50,000 ($8,910; £6,780)."
Pretty sure that will include Starlink.

Instead of creating a law. The supreme court creates precedence. So in Democratic republics the judicial branch can do as they please? No. Their whole damn courts unhinged. Apparently the whole damn judicial branch is crooked. Why does the supreme court of Brazil have to get it's nose involved in silencing citizens on PLATFORMS!?!?!?!? JUST ARREST THE CITIZENS!!!! BUT APPARENTLY THEY WANT TO ATTACK CORPORTATIONS AND LEAVE THE PROBLEMATIC CITIZENS ALONE! Throw musk in a deep pit, but do it for a damn good reason like he doesn't pay a living wage.

The court is doing its job, X is not. Businesses should adhere to the country's law. They can't pick and choose what to obey or not obey and not expect to take the heat. Elon Musk's decision to ignore the order was childish and only caused more harm to itself.
- Oh no, it's not. As much as I hate Elon Musk, Alexandre de Moraes is a criminal. Some of the accounts he is trying to ban are specifically talking about some of his criminal activities. He unconstitutionally blocked Starlink some days ago because Elon Musk is part of the board. He ordered the blocking of ALL VPN services because he didn't want people to access Twitter. That creates a TERRIBLE precedent, even if you agree that what he was doing in the first place was right. He already blocked Telegram and have been censoring everyone who says anything against him. As a Brazilian, it's really conflicting to see all this going on. Elon Musk is an idiot and Moraes is a criminal.