The Only Kind of “Political Violence” All U.S. Politicians Oppose
The Only Kind of “Political Violence” All U.S. Politicians Oppose

The Only Kind of “Political Violence” All U.S. Politicians Oppose

The issue, rather, is what picture of “political violence” this messaging serves: To say that “political violence” has “no place” in a society organized by political violence at home and abroad is to acquiesce to the normalization of that violence, so long as it is state and capitalist monopolized.
As author Ben Ehrenreich noted on X, “There is no place for political violence against rich, white men. It is antithetical to everything America stands for.”
Palestinians should kill Khamaas!
Russians should assasinate Putin!
America should... idly stand by because violence is never the answer guys.
Spot on.
I mean I don't exactly expect democratic politicians to advocate for political assassinations as you know, they are politicians, so of course as soon as one of their own comes under attack even if they're on the other side of politics they're gonna denounce it cause they don't want to be assassinated.
I read this article as asking politicians to go the other direction with this logic and extend this abhorrence of violence they have when it comes their fellow political leaders to homeless people, migrants, civilians in war zones, etc.
"democratic politicians", "person who incited attack on the capitol because he lost the election" and "one of us" can't be in the same sentence.
it is imho simply the case that they can't publicly say "oh fuck, so close, why did that moron miss?"