zlatiah @ zlatiah @lemmy.world

Ask me about:

---

Read more

Posts

88

Comments

143

Joined

10 mo. ago

• Strength 6
• Dexterity 6
• Constitution 2
• Intelligence 20
• Wisdom 16
• Charisma 2

I'd wish to reroll my stats or at least try a different build

Tommy does have yellow and green/blue eyes; the exact color seems to depend on lighting and the person

Yup I was referring to Sinder

I only really watch clips so I wasn't that personally invested in the drama itself (other than finding it intriguing). But it did hit a bit too close to home since my boss was almost exactly like that so...

Try to use some type of boiling water technique to invent drinkable sanitary drinking water that doesn't get me drunk (might not be necessary in some parts of Asia)

Most parts of the world that is not North America: try to convince some wealthy persons and bar owners to sponsor me to getting a bunch of bread molds and rats/mice, possibly even pigs, to conduct antibiotics and vaccine research, otherwise I might die from random sources...

Not sure if I could reasonably do those given my limited biology knowledge, but I guess they are worth trying. Besides that I'd just try to be less blunt/offensive so I don't get sent to jail and try to live my best life I guess

1. See other recommendations for gaming-specific distros as I'm not familiar with them... Overall, most "beginner-friendly" distros (Fedora, Mint, ...) that are not named Ubuntu are good. Ubuntu is not bad per-se: they just have their own ways of doing certain things that are counter-intuitive. Also don't follow the memes and use Arch Linux or something (Arch is good, but not-beginner-friendly)
2. Some multi-player games have anti-cheats that straight-up won't work on linux, so if you play any large online-based games it might help to check their linux support first. Otherwise, there are unique examples like Skyrim that are very hard to mod on linux, but most mainstream games should work either out-of-the-box or with very minor tinkering. Unless if you're into some weird esoteric retro games like me... if so then good luck learning WINE lol
3. As long as you follow 1 you should be fine. In my opinion most beginner linux distros are more intuitive than Windows so...
4. I'm not sure if it is a good idea to dual boot unless you are reasonably familiar with computers... as dual booting can be finicky and sometimes Windows can just eat the linux partition. But I think it is doable? Again I don't recommend dual-booting so...
5. IMO the biggest decision most beginners have to make is between Gnome/KDE (two of the most popular desktop environments), not between distros. Try to see which one clicks with you more! Also make sure to back up data before switching. Good luck!

Just because two sides are fighting doesn't mean one side is good (something along this line)

... I don't think it is that profound, but I think about it a lot

Option 2

Not that I dislike 1, but between me being on the spectrum and having experience living alone in a foreign country w/o family for close to 10 years (and literally could only talk with family using video chats), I think I would be much more competent than the average person on living in the latter... Which also helps free out more space for ppl in option 1

I think the best fit would be an immigration lawyer? Those ppl are incredibly expensive (probably in the $1000s to begin with) and are country-specific, so mostly only ppl who have difficult cases do that...

Can try to search the subreddits r/iwantout and r/immigration first, they have lots of good resources and past posts. Also can try expat.com

Also don't make my mistake... finding a job in a foreign country is incredibly hard, even with a doctorate. So it helps to cast a wide net and/or get a job offer first before making further plans

Oh boy I do have some hilarious career-related stories! But yeah, I very seriously considered taking a job in Germany at one point (didn't end up happening). Maybe I'll chat a bit more about it somewhere else

Four. English, Chinese, Japanese, German.

Among these German is the only one where I'm not confident in my language capacities... So I almost beat OP in the bet :P I just happened to have learned German up until ~A2 for career reasons but dropped it since my plans changed. Other three I'm all very fluent in. I am also learning French but ironically I only know 1/2/3 because I'm a complete newbie...

I spent the last 10 years in the US so my internal monolog is a bit messed up... I primarily count in English which is not my native language. If it is a long number I'll use Chinese since it is more efficient (one syllable each for 0-10)

So... disclaimer first! I have played chess but only a year or so; I got into chess during the pandemic and had a peak ELO of ~1600+ on chess.com and 1900+ on Lichess; probably translates to a classical ELO of ~1200 (competition is tough in classical...). Obviously I'm not remotely a good player, but I can hold my ground. I also had to do a neuropsych evaluation recently for mental health reasons, so I spent the last month of my free time looking into research of intelligence (g factor, IQ tests, the disturbing history, etc...) for my own curiosity. So I might have a bit of knowledge on this... but:

For the most part chess is its own unique skills and is unrelated to "smartness". Nevertheless, I think chess might be related to probably just one or two specific narrow fields of intelligence. Being good at chess requires one to be knowledgeable of various chess openings (memorization, working memory), extremely strong pattern recognition (Magnus Carlsen is really good at this; AlphaZero was literally all pattern recognition due to the way it works), and being able to see 5, 10, or even 15 steps ahead and consider all the rational options (again, working memory)

I just took the WAIS-V test two weeks ago for my psych eval, and they do indeed test for working memory and pattern recognition in specific sub-tasks. However the difference is... IQ tests are never meant to be practiced as they measure a type of "potential" if you may, but chess is all about what you actually play on the board. Sure maybe if ppl were literally just given the rules and had no prior exposure then a smarter person might spot a forced checkmate faster, but ppl do pratice for the game... In fact, the advice people used to give to get better at chess is... to do more puzzles

Sooo... methinks an intelligent person might have a slight edge training themselves to do the above, but there is probably otherwise very little association. After a certain point intelligence itself probably has no influence on chess performance whatsoever, and realistically it's more about "grit", or how much time/effort someone puts into the game

Aaand... case in point. Apparently Kasparov went through a 3-day intensive intelligence test, but had a really "spiky" profile that is more commonly seen in neurodivergent individuals; scored really high on some categories and abysmally low on others. I saw this random Reddit post which says that Carlsen scored 115(+1SD) on AGCT (a fairly quick and accurate online test), which is not low but not impressive by any means either. Nakamura allegedly got 102 on Mensa Norway's trial test, which is not as accurate as AGCT but should be fairly good too; 102 is like dead-average

Bear, but I think it's because gorillas are known to be peaceful and will probably run away from conflict

If it is a fight to the death... Idk I think with how physics works it might be quite even?

Yup... I had a suspicion that the Belgian system will somehow be different, so thankfully I didn't find this out the hard way. I could have almost bricked my laptop login password that way...

Also it's the first time I had to use my right hand to type the Alt key which is so trippy

Moving to Belgium for a new job so...

Apparently my case is uncommon... I haven't voted in any serious elections yet. I'm still relatively young, the country where I have citizenship doesn't allow elections, and I have never been a permanent resident anywhere else that allows elections so...

I’m talking about PRC btw

Oh... OH

Their advice is good in this very specific context as the PRC is a bit... special, see other comments. They don't limit their reach to just Chinese citizens either, my interpretation of what has happened in Canada with the secret police stations is that they might consider all ethnically Chinese people fair game

For most instances though, methinks valid constructive criticisms toward the government is a good way to keep democracy going, and unfortunately this process sometimes involve protesting. I can't make decisions for others when a social cause is more important than their own safety, but to each their own at that point so...

This might not apply to people who are not Autistic or somewhat neurodivergent but... my therapist literally just pointed out to me a few weeks ago that I have Alexithymia (emotional blindness)

I have been much more in tune with my emotions afterwards and realized I was actually quite satisfied/content with life a lot of the times, it's just that way too often I would not have known I was happy. So I guess if anyone's also neurodivergent in some way it might be a good thing to look into

Northwestern's president sent an official email at 9 pm last night on this topic while being as sarcastic as ever

On the other R site there have been researchers at Cornell stating that they received stop-work orders

Shit is hitting the fan

My interpretation is that visitors don't have specific rights to criticize a government per-se. However! In most non-authoritarian countries, everyone has the unequivocal rights to criticize a government as long as they are not intending on disobeying other harassment/discrimination laws, regardless of their status. Since visitors are also included in "everyone", they can criticize a government too

Of course this only applies to non-authoritarian countries. Authoritarian countries don't have that right even for their citizens, so visitors are not excluded either

(I hate where this train of thought is going but whatever...)