zkfcfbzr @ zkfcfbzr @lemmy.world

Posts

22

Comments

399

Joined

2 yr. ago

Link for those who like me did not get it at first.

My passwords use the full set of characters I can type by hand on a standard US qwerty keyboard, and I've only run into a few sites that have complained and made me use something simpler. PayPal is one of them. Some of the others are Zenni Optical, eBay, and FedLoan.

In total that's about 8% of my accounts. So the vast majority of sites seem to let you use whatever, at least. I only use 15 characters so I have no comments on length. I am equally annoyed when a new site makes me use simpler passwords.

And not niche enough. The stuff I like on reddit has 28 posts from the last 24 hours. The equivalent on lemmynsfw hasn't had a single post since mid-July and I'm pretty sure the restrictive rules on pornlemmy would just ban it if posted there.

It goes both ways. There are ways Lemmy is better than reddit, even in this early stage - and the default interface is 100% one of those. Default reddit is getting more and more like facebook these days.

But the lack of users on lemmy really hurts it. Of the 20 posts on my current All page, 13 of them have 0 comments. 5 of the remaining 7 have fewer than 5 comments.

I really think Lemmy has the potential to eventually surpass reddit - but I by no means at all think it's even close to that point yet. While it still has a long way to go software-wise, growing its userbase is by far the biggest hurdle it has to overcome. And as long as reddit keeps getting worse I think we'll get there.

I did get your point that reddit's strengths don't really matter if it's wrapped in a package that's unusable. I just disagree that that means Lemmy is automatically better in every way.

I am also not overly into this chat - because of what I said not what you said. I considered deleting my original message because it was more negative than I care to be, but left it because people had already replied. I'd really rather not get sucked into a chain of messages where all I'm doing is complaining about Lemmy.

This but about how almost everything about Lemmy is spun as either good, or better than reddit's equivalent.

Like the other day I saw a post about how Lemmy's active users were on the decline, trying to claim that was somehow good for Lemmy. Or back when Lemmy had its /r/place copy, there were plenty of people saying it was better than reddit's. Basically anything about Lemmy that's somewhat lacking has people desperately trying to defend it as actually superior.

It borders on delusional at times. Yes Lemmy is good, but reddit is still better in dozens of ways, almost all of them related to user count. And this is coming from one of the people who deleted their reddit account and replaced it with Lemmy cold turkey - I haven't been back there (except for porn) in almost 8 weeks.

Whoops 🙃 At least I gave the numbers a disclaimer right afterward. Maybe $7 million would be more realistic.

If you have something like a structured settlement from a lawsuit where you receive periodic payments of $X every month, or an annuity that pays out $Y a month, or anything like that - over the entire duration of the settlement or annuity you'll receive $Z total. JG Wentworth will give you some fraction of that $Z now, immediately, as a lump sum - and in turn all future periodic payments go to them. So you get a lot in the short term, but less than you would in the long term - and they get more in the long term than they gave you in the short term.

For a specific example, say you won $10,000,000 in the lottery, and it pays out of a 20 year annuity giving you $500,000 per year. JG Wentworth may give you $15,000,000 now in exchange for all future payments.

Those numbers are all completely made up - I don't know what kind of percentage they take.

They put out commercials like this. There are loads of them - hence the meme.

Whenever they put that "Dear reader, if everyone reading this sent $X, etc" notice at the top of an article, I send whatever the amount they mention in the notice is.

I've only ever noticed it like 5 times since I started doing that a bunch of years ago - not sure if that means they don't ask that often, or if it means I don't visit them often enough to always see it.

I'm pretty sure I'm in a minority here, but I like that lemmy.world is so huge - and think it's both positive for the lemmyverse and an excellent starting point for new users.

It ties into the new user experience a lot: lemmy.world has a large userbase so most communities will already show up in its All. It's consistently had new registrations open where many others have closed during large sign-up rushes. It has a thoughtful admin team experienced with running services like this. It's likely to be around for the very long term and, short of some DDoS attacks, should be fairly reliable.

I know having instances this big is objectively bad if you're measuring things like how distributed or resilient to disruption the Lemmyverse is, but I think the positives outweigh the negatives on the whole.

If I'm honest, I think the best way to implement an "I know which instance I pick isn't that important, please just send me to a random one" feature would be to send the user to a random one of the top 5 largest instances. I stopped short of suggesting that because I know it would be deeply unpopular though - enough so that it becomes a bad idea on that merit alone.

They should add filters for language and general purpose vs. specific topic; options to sort by size, age, connectedness, and reliability; write a short blurb about the administration policy of each instance (provided by the instance admins themselves); and add an "I'm feeling lucky" button that picks a proven reliable general purpose instance at random and just sends you to it. As well as big, bold text at the top saying "The instance you pick honestly isn't that important".

That's my usual strategy - this was the first time I had to do it without really having a reference image. I didn't even try to use what was visible on the box.

It ended up not being too hard. In the beginning (after the edge obviously) I progressed by sorting pieces by color. As an example, I put every single piece with even a tiny bit of purple into one pile. Then I tried to connect the pieces in just that pile - which in the case of purple ended up making me 3 or 4 distinct objects. While I didn't know what I was making (I thought I was making a sea monster, ended up being a straw hat), the pool of pieces was low enough to make it not too hard to find connections.

Once I'd done that for all the colors that were rare enough to make that strategy useful, I was about half-way done - by which point it wasn't too bad to figure out what sorts of pieces I needed to find to extend which sections of puzzle I already had assembled. The only truly painful part was all the pieces that were just water - which would have been hard even with a reference picture.

It can also help to sort the pieces by shape: since there are so many fewer of the non-standard shapes you have a lot fewer pieces to check when you find a missing spot that's not going to to fit a standard piece. And you can get pretty tricky about how you spot where nonstandard pieces go: For example, two innie or two outie bits in a row on an edge mean one of them has to be nonstandard, as do a few other patterns.

The surprise is nice: The puzzle I did ended up being vaguely Christmas themed, which is something you can't tell from the box at all.

The last of the puzzles I just did was a Wasgij - which always does tricky things with the box art. For this one you're shown a scene on the front of the box, then the actual puzzle is what someone in that scene would see from their perspective - so most of the puzzle isn't actually shown, and the things that are shown are in the wrong perspective. It was interesting to do since my puzzle strategy usually relies heavily on comparing pieces to the box.

I'm working through my first playthrough of Stray. Last save I was just about to leave the Slums for what I understand to be the final time. Going for 100% and so far don't think I've missed anything.

Not exactly video games, but I've also been doing puzzles lately - just completed my 4th in like a week. They were 300, 300, 1000, and 1000 pieces - but the last one only had 999 pieces present 🙁 Gonna try to make the missing piece myself before I return them to the library.

After Stray I might start on New Super Mario Bros. U Deluxe too. Wanna get through it before Wonder comes out.

Edit: lol just realized this is the Nintendo community and not general gaming. Oh well, at least I fit NSMBUD in there

Instructions on how to contact any online acquaintances or communities that should be informed of your death

There's no real reason to think he'd caucus with the Republicans. He votes with Democrats far more often than he votes with Republicans.

That part's real - not for 0.999 but for 0.999... (repeating). The classic proof goes:

Let x = 0.999999...

Then multiply both sides by 10. You now have:

10x = 9.999999.....

Now subtract the first equation from the second equation. You get:

10x - x = 9.999999... - 0.999999...

9x = 9

Then divide by 9 to complete the proof:

x = 1

As someone who eats more foods without chewing than I should... Thanks.

Also got a bad habit of eating the kind of food that clogs your throat if you don't drink, without drinking - like a McDonald's burger or risotto. Got it so bad with risotto last year that I couldn't get water down at all, and had to wait it out.

They jump from 0.99999... = 1 to 0.99999... = 1 - 1 in the step where they introduce the limit, because the value of the limit they wrote is 1, not the 0 they probably thought it was. So the whole thing is a crapshoot from the start - functionally no different from setting up 1 = 1 - 1, simplifying to 1 = 0, and claiming you broke math

Since he'd become an independent who caucuses with the democrats, it wouldn't change the balance of power in the senate even if there were still a 50/50 split. Sanders, Angus King, and Sinema are already independents who causus with the democrats.

I agree that my idea probably wouldn't be great, for the reasons we both stated. While multicommunities are a good idea, I'm not sure they address the specific issue bothering me either, of crossposts spamming the All feed. OP's idea might help with that a little - but honestly, I just think the 'Hot' algorithm needs some more fine tuning, and perhaps custom logic to avoid showing duplicates.