Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ZE
Posts
8
Comments
635
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • If the US would start dialogue with China it might actually stand a chance of taking on Russia and winning without destabilizing the region. Direct US intervention in the region would be akin to Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan: it would serve to destabilize the region.

    The US will never consider this because it prefers a weak Russia to a strong China.

  • There needs to be services that directly connect farmers with consumers. The grocery store serves as a middleman that's honestly become rather useless given that many people use another middleman (Instacart, etc.) to actually get their groceries.

    I'm open to building one and have a decent way of organizing logistics, but I have no idea how to reach out to farmers (who to reach out to, for what crops, and who is getting the most exploited by grocery stores).

  • Economic think tank doesn't realize that a two-bedroom apartment would probably be shared between two people.

    The solution, as it always is, is to increase density everywhere. Increased density supports more transit, which decreases traffic and allows for faster commutes.

  • The same thing is true for the US (who, while more similar to us, are still so far from our way of life that a documentary on "what if the US invaded Canada" could be made by a leading US media outlet).

    The same thing is true for Russia.

    The same thing is true for India.

    The problem is that we are focusing SPECIFICALLY on Chinese foreign interference because it's an easy target to point at. We are under threat by many different countries around the world because of our massive swathes of natural resources and our tendency to somehow produce technologies that no one can compete with (Blackberry, Nortel (milked by Huawei), Bombardier (completely fucked over by Boeing through the US DOJ)).

    We need better protection against all foreign interference. Attacking a boogeyman today is just leaving us vulnerable to everything else. It's harming our international reputation and it's doing very little to actually protect Canadian democracy or the economy.

  • Bing has like 5% market share lol

    And LinkedIn? The amount of link volume coming out of LinkedIn is negligible.

    Microsoft's core businesses are Windows, Office, and Azure. They might be "big tech" but they're not "big ad tech".

  • A healthy startup environment in a country is basically an indiscriminate venture capital firm... As long as your average startup founder has a bust-out rate (99%) lower than the return on a success (>100x), you're winning.

    Thing is, there are no industries where this is viable relative to the US.