This is a good example of the worst kind of pseudo intellectual bs that tricks the uninformed. It's confidently wrong in so many different areas that I don't even know where to start.
Nope I mean of the language itself has three different version for most words.
So for example, for the word "you", when you are speaking to someone who is a close friend or sometimes a child, or someone of much lower social standing, you would say "tui". If you are talking to a friend (not close), someone of similar age that you know well but aren't super close, speaking to someone noticeably much younger than you, or to an elder who you are very comfortable with, you would say "tumi". When speaking to someone you don't know who is visibly not much younger than you, or when speaking to most elders, you would say "apni".
If you don't want to assume age and you aren't speaking to a child, it's best to default to "apni" as that is the most respectful form of the language.
So there are three versions of the language with it's own set of words based on the level of formality in the social interaction that is taking place.
I speak bengali and we don't have the word "the" nor do we have any gendered nouns, verbs, or even pronouns. So much easier and straight forward and no pronoun politics necessary.
We do have a respect hierarchy though like japanese, so we have 3 version of the language lol.
When they say turn exercise into a habit, I don't think they mean it the same as in other habits where you do so without thought. I would say besides my actual OCD, I am a neurotypical person who has been working out for years. Yes it's a lot easier for me to do so now, but I still have to actively decide to go workout each and every time.
Record breaking temperatures do not account for anything before records start. Obviously.
Firstly setting new records repeatedly for records that have existed for a 100+ years is still extremely concerning. I don't know how you think this is actually somehow a rebuttal of what I said. Additionally we have average temperature and environmental conditions going back millions of years through ice core and geologic records.
There are no numbers in my comment which should be backed up by evidence. These are an example.
80% and 20% are numbers. My point is your "example" is made up and hence meaningless. It's as meaningful as me giving you an example where all work that is dont to pay for that additional cost is done through green means.
What I’ve used is called conditional logic mostly.
What you've done is not understand how conditional logic works as your IF/THEN conditional statement is not based on reality and is speaking purely hypothetically. I agree that in your made up reality that doesn't exist, this made up condition would not be reasonable.
About the rest - I do realize that connecting money (as the universal equivalent) to energy and energy (from all sources) to pollution may be too complex for you.
Apparently the whole concept of reading may be too complex for you as you clearly seem to lack the ability to comprehend what you've read. Dirty solutions have environmental impact that ultimately has a monetary cost to mitigate. Just because you don't pay for it at purchase does not mean there is not a monetary cost.
You know, the time you took to type up this response showing that you are ignorant of reality, you could've spent just looking up the information on google and informing yourself. It literally took me 2 seconds to look it up.
I mean, not as if 40C was unheard of in the Mediterranean?..
Record breaking temperatures are by definition unheard of. What the Mediterranean is experiencing is not normal by any definition.
When you pay more for a green alternative to something very much not green, you may be causing lots of bad things indirectly.
The not green versions are also costing us by costing the environment.
I mean, if a thing itself is 100% green energy\resource\process, then money you pay for it are maybe 20% green and 80% pretty much brown. So if it costs twice and you pay for that, you may be creating a demand for dirtier production just to soothe your conscience about global warming.
This makes absolutely not sense at all. You have absolutely no evidence or data to back up these numbers you made up. You've essentially made a bunch of false assumptions and then used those false assumptions to then validate your inaccurate claim.
Quite decent actually. Have some of the lowest crime rates in Canada while the people saying we are falling apart have way higher crime rates, way less jobs, and has never actually been to our city.
I most definitely would not describe most of reddit as ultra liberal so if you think it is, I wonder what your definition of "not conservative" is. In my experience, a lot of reddit subs lean more to the right.
I love water resistance. You don't need to get rid of water resistance for removal batteries, we had both, together, at the same time, before. Samsung s5 active.
Not everything is an opinion. I don't know why people now days think they can argue anything by claiming it's their opinion. She has more power and influence than the vast vast majority of Americans. Whether you want her to be relevant or not does not change the reality that she is relevant.
As 15+ yr old reddit user, can't agree more. The digg migration was the best and worst thing to happen to reddit imo. It really boosted communities yes however it also significantly lowered the content quality.
It sounds like you basically just don't want a switch. The reason the switch has done so well is because of the portability and ability to easily dock and "switch" between modes. If you want a traditional console, that has a disk tray, and tons of power, you should consider a playstation or xbox. Additionally I am very supportive of backwards compatibility but at this point, the GCN would be 4 generations (going to be 25 years on switch 2 release) back and having to put in hardware to be backwards compatible that far back I think is unreasonable.
Businesses, especially game developers, have zero motivation to go first and potentially lose money. Especially when they're entire primary demographic is already on another platform that another company has already done the hard work in marketing. So not really chicken and the egg scenario.
Are you sure they would? It costs a lot of money to port games and market it and maybe looking at the demographics of their market, it's just not worth it financially to port it to PC.
I primarily watch YouTube on tv, it is my most used video streaming platform, so yes I do. As does all my friends.