Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ZE
Posts
1
Comments
143
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Not being paranoid about some imaginary evil? It's actually great. You should try it instead of making enemies of shit that don't matter.

    Seeing that you are angry enough that you are willing to destroy private propertyto impose your own paranoid beliefs on others, you should try it, it might help your mental health.

  • Because you haven't actually explained what makes it evil. Just claimed that it is. Also using a slippery slope argument is always a sign of bs.

    Why is less privacy inherently evil of the people giving up their privacy is doing so willingly and don't care for it?

  • Why is surveillance inherently evil? Secondly if other people don't care about this, who are you to deny them what they consider a convenience and don't have a problem with? What gives you a right to impose your beliefs on others?

  • If you don't like it, don't use it. It's extremely presumptuous to assume your extent views on this matter is the only right view to the point you think it's ok to enforce that view on everyone else.

  • I just don't subscribe to the slippery slope arguments I am provided when it comes to privacy. I and I suspect most other people just prefer convenience to some hypothetical threat to what I am not sure.

  • Because it's hard for non techie users to even understand what the word instance means. It's not a concept you encounter in everyday life.

    And then without a broad algorithm that curate your feed, most users get confused on how to manage their communities across the fediverse.