It's dangerous to get too obsessed with trying to secure everything against state actor level threats. It's not that hard to dramatically increase your privacy if you're currently using a regular android phone. Sure, yes, more security is better, but a single individual's private information isn't actually that valuable. It only becomes valuable to exploit people at a massive scale. Even just putting up minor speedbumps to data collection can massively increase your privacy as long as you aren't being individually targeted, and more people getting into caring about their privacy is a good thing. Any de-googled android rom is already a big step in that direction. Lets not let perfect be the enemy of good.
My dude. Dude. People are in here complaining about a fascist and all you have to contribute is "um, actually"ing them for using the name of the wrong fascist subtype? I think you've lost the plot, my dude.
It's important to remember that politicians are still people, too. Some of them might just not have realized what would happen, some of them might just be corrupt, some of them might have known this was a bad idea but played along anyway to try and get support for things they thought were more important. There isn't actually a single motivator for all of the Democratic Party. That's just not how people work.
For my laptop, yeah. I rarely actually use it though. For my desktop not so much. I really don't keep that much personal information on it to begin with, and if someone breaks into my house they could probably get more by stealing the desk my computer is sitting on then by stealing the computer. It just feels like a silly thing to waste my time with.
I'm sorry, but lemmy.world was the worst possible decision for a place to relocate to. I wouldn't follow you there even if I could. If you really have to go with a big, liberal instance that will let you moderate however you want at least you should have gone with lemm.ee. They're not making lemmy monolithic, not as much of a troll magnet, and far more competent at what they do.
While it's certainly true that some of the people who are angry at him for that tweet are saying things in their anger that are overboard, I think only pointing out the most ridiculous things that people who disagree with you have ever said in their anger is a really terrible way of engaging honestly on the subject.
It's important to remember that an authoritarian that always figured out what the right thing to do was and did the opposite of that would be a really bad authoritarian. Republicans at the state level have been increasing state surveillance to hunt down and punish people for choices they make with their own bodies. For a lot of people in America, Trump is the head of the organization that they want privacy to protect themselves from, and the current largest threat to privacy in America.
For the CEO of a company that is supposedly about protecting our privacy to completely unprompted start publicly praising decisions made by the very threat we're supposed to trust them to protect us from, and then to double down on their praise when called out, is deeply concerning.
Yes. It's true that not every single thing Trump does will be the worst possible thing, but his goals are fundamentally opposed to ours. When I say I want big tech to be broken up it's because I want their to be less concentration of power. When Trump wants to break up big tech it's because he wants to eliminate the competition to his concentration of power. That is not worthy of my praise, even if in any one particular instance the thing he is doing is similar to what I would do, and the fact that the CEO of Proton either doesn't understand this or doesn't care is deeply concerning. I do not trust them after this, and I doubt they can ever get that trust back.
Call it hate if you want, but it is an intentional design decision to break compatibility with other DEs. That is a choice they consciously made and have been very clear in communicating. There are trade offs involved. I'm not saying it's a completely irrational choice or anything, but it is aggravating for those of us that don't use Gnome when we have to deal with libadwaita apps. Libadwaita is designed from the ground up to be a Gnome exclusive thing. It is not for Linux. It is just for Gnome. That is the developers' stated intention.
You sure did. Maybe libadwaita even includes tools to make it easier or something, I don't know. I just think maybe the toolkit that breaks everything all the time isn't the best example.
You can't just misread something and then claim that makes it clickbait. That term is losing all meaning from overuse. It's an article about a Linux distro and it has the name of that distro in the title. That's not clickbait.
What!? Next thing you know you'll be telling me that imperialist nations are all bad and we shouldn't be cheerleading the second biggest one just to spite the biggest.
MOND isn't even a great way to explain rotation curves. It's pretty easy to make a pretty close model for the majority of galaxies, but there are a lot of weird outliers where it's pretty easy to say they just have more or less dark matter than usual, but MOND has a really hard time explaining them without making it so that physics works differently in different galaxies.
Because there's a company that makes the software used to run a Mastodon instance. Same way Mozilla has a CEO even though they're not in charge of the internet.
Yes? The point is that if you give it conflicting prompts then it will result in potentially dangerous behaviors. That's a bad thing. People will definitely do that. LLMs don't need a soul to be dangerous. People keep saying that it doesn't understand what it's doing like that somehow matters. Its capacity to understand the consequences of its actions is irrelevant if those actions are dangerous. It's just going to do what we tell it to, and that's scary, because people are going to tell it to do some very stupid things that have the potential to get out of control.
It's dangerous to get too obsessed with trying to secure everything against state actor level threats. It's not that hard to dramatically increase your privacy if you're currently using a regular android phone. Sure, yes, more security is better, but a single individual's private information isn't actually that valuable. It only becomes valuable to exploit people at a massive scale. Even just putting up minor speedbumps to data collection can massively increase your privacy as long as you aren't being individually targeted, and more people getting into caring about their privacy is a good thing. Any de-googled android rom is already a big step in that direction. Lets not let perfect be the enemy of good.