Skip Navigation

User banner
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ @ yogthos @lemmy.ml
Posts
9,797
Comments
10,566
Joined
6 yr. ago

Technology @lemmy.ml

MemOS, treats memory as a core computational resource that can be scheduled, shared, and evolved over time resulting in significant performance improvements over existing AI approaches

Science @lemmy.ml

Archaeologists Discovered an Unprecedented Ancient Monument That Could Rewrite History

United States | News & Politics @lemmy.ml

Measles Cases Hit Record High, 25 Years After U.S. Eliminated the Disease

World News @lemmy.ml

Houthi attack on cargo ship kills 3 mariners, European naval force says

United States | News & Politics @lemmy.ml

“Philadelphia Works Because We Do”: One week into strike, Philly city workers flex collective power

World News @lemmy.ml

Love to see a Canadian mining company CEOs crying about their gold getting appropriated.

Socialism @lemmy.ml

Paywalls

Firefox @lemmy.ml

Firefox is fine. The people running it are not

Technology @lemmy.ml

Researchers Jailbreak AI by Flooding It With Bullshit Jargon

United States | News & Politics @lemmy.ml

‘It’s a nightmare.’ U.S. funding cuts threaten academic science jobs at all levels

Mastodon @lemmy.ml

Mastodon 4.4

United States | News & Politics @lemmy.ml

Discrimination lawsuit refiled against semiconductor giant TSMC Arizona

United States | News & Politics @lemmy.ml

“Every man for himself”: Texas reels after flash floods and 90+ death toll as Trump plans to slash federal disaster response

World News @lemmy.ml

US only has 25% of all Patriot missile interceptors needed for Pentagon’s military plans

World News @lemmy.ml

Ukrainian Troops Struggle to Hold the Line on the Eastern Front

World News @lemmy.ml

Ind. Public Universities “Voluntarily” Ending 19% of Degrees

United States | News & Politics @lemmy.ml

World's Largest Pension Fund Now Loses $61bn As Dollar Falls

World News @lemmy.ml

Popular referendum in Brazil launches vote for taxing the super-rich and reducing working hours

United States | News & Politics @lemmy.ml

Exclusive: DOJ, FBI conclude Epstein had no "client list," died by suicide

Socialism @lemmy.ml

Surplus Value

  • I started with plants, but moved on to birds and occasional critters like chipmunks. Birds definitely take a bit of patience to get nice shots I find. I post some of my stuff on here https://pixelfed.social/Yogthos

  • I got into doing nature photography over the pandemic as a way to get out of the house, and it's been amazing for my mental health. It forced me to get out and just live in the moment really paying attention to the environment around me. I've realized how little we notice of the world around us normally. I've also found martial arts are a similar experience in a sense that you're really just focused on the moment and forget about everything else you've been thinking about.

  • What all this illustrates is that the US lacks industrial capacity for maintaining its hegemony. They've run through their existing stocks over the past three years, and they're unable to manufacture weapons at the rate they're being consumed. As a result, they have to make hard choices regarding which proxies have more value to them.

  • If that's not a sign of panic, I don't know what is.

  • I find what you generally want is a service bus. For example, if you have common tasks like sending emails, making PDFs, etc. you can create generic services that handle the action, and then call them providing the context such as the document the service should operate on. Meanwhile, actual business logic and the state should absolutely live in a single place.

  • Wait till you find out how modern economies function.

  • That's one thing that's stayed constant to this day.

  • Turns out Russian propagandists have infiltrated the heart of Ukraine. 🤣

  • Wait till you find out what country .ua domain is owned by. Absolutely hilarious how fascists are invariably the most ignorant people on the fediverse. 🤡

  • should do an AMA on how long it took you

  • Ah yes, an Ukrainian publication is spreading Russian propaganda, that's what you're saying?

  • Have some humility and willingness to learn.

    I have plenty of willingness to learn from people who have a clue on the subject.

    I didn’t say it was the primary function.

    You literally tried to argue that evolution doesn't create complexity if there's a more efficient path.th.

    Then what about Darwin who literally said, “Natural selection is continually trying to economize every part of the organization.” Now please go and read some introductory texts on biology before trying to explain to me why Darwin is wrong. There’s so much going on when it comes to the thermodynamics of living systems and you’re clearly not ready to have a conversation about it.

    Again, you're showing a superficial understanding of the subject here. Natural selection selects for overall fitness, and efficiency is only a small part of equation. For example, plants don't use the most efficient wavelength for producing energy, they use the one that's most reliably available. Similarly, living organisms have all kinds of redundancies that allow them to continue to function when they're damaged. Evolution optimizes for survival over efficiency.

    You’re baseless assuming that hydrocephalus causes the brain to lose a substantial amount of its complexity.

    Maybe read the actual paper linked there?

    But hey neuroscience hasn’t really advanced at all since 1980 right? The brain is totally redundant right? There’s no possible way a critical and discerning person such as yourself could have been taken in by junk science, right?!!

    What I linked you is a case study of an actual living person who was missing large parts of their brain and had a relatively normal life. But hey why focus on the actual facts when you can just write more word salad right?

    I took issue with specific statements you made that stand apart from the rest of your comment.

    You took issue with made up straw man arguments that you yourself made and have fuck all with what I actually said. Then you proceeded to demonstrate that you don't actually understand the subject you're debating. You might as well start believing in the astrology, crystals, and energy healing. At least those interests will make you seem fun and quirky instead of just a sad debate bro.

  • Im simply stating that you’re way off base when you claim that they appear to operate using the same principles or that all evidence suggests the human mind is nothing more than a probability machine.

    I literally said these things, and you never gave any actual counter argument to either of them.

    You’re betraying your own ignorance about neuroscience. The complexity of the brain is absolutely linked with its ability to reason and we have plenty of evidence to show that. The evolutionary process does not just create needless complexity if there is a more efficient path.

    You're betraying your ignorance of how biology works and illustrating that you have absolutely no business debating this subject. Efficiency is not the primary fitness function for evolution, it's survivability. And that means having a lot of redundancy baked into the system. Here's a concrete example for you of just how much of the brain isn't actually essential for normal day to day function. https://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=6116

    This is such a silly statement especially when you’ve been claiming that both the brain and AI appear to work using the same principles.

    There's nothing silly in stating that the underlying principles are similar, but we don't understand a lot of the mechanics of the brain. If you truly can't understand such basic things there's little point trying to have a meaningful discussion.

    I don’t really care about your arguments concerning embodiment because they’re so beside the point when you just blowing right by the most basic principles of neuroscience.

    That's literally the whole context for this thread, it just doesn't fit with the straw man you want to argue about.

    A ruthless criticism of that exists includes the very researchers whose work you’re taking at face value.

    Whose work am I taking at face value specifically? You're just spewing nonsense here without engaging with anything I'm saying.

  • thank you for gracing us with an example of how a thirteen year old understands the world