yetiftw @ yetiftw @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

133

Joined

2 yr. ago

a very fine line to tread indeed

that doesn't necessarily mean it is possible though. just to be clear

how is a concern about upending precedent a nonsensical statement? the source of an argument does not impact its validity as a point

but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn't address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument

but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn't address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument

not saying you're wrong, but that is a whataboutism

I meant that both only exist due to the labor of individuals. without the workforce, billionaires and corporations would not exist

arguably billionaires and corporations are still people-powered

edit: as in the wealth of billionaires and corporations only exists due to the exploration of the labor of the people. without that labor, billionaires wouldn't exist

your loss then; I like it!

they're still people

yes

those are most likely tags from someone without full reply permissions

it's a completely unrelated novel series. set in space and clearly sci fi, but has castles, dueling, war games, and peasants

maybe, just maybe, there actually isn't that big of a difference between sci fi and fantasy

so red rising is fantasy and not sci fi?

arguably the space part makes it sci fi

a source is always needed tf

yes thank you leto ii

arguably science itself has been constructed in a social context ie a social construct

no true scotsman fallacy