Not voting for the lesser evil is very much akin to supporting the greater evil because the greater evil is receiving a larger share of votes.
Who would you vote for: Adolf Hitler or some person who stole a child's lollypop once, who seeks to improve everyone's lifes? According to you, voting for neither would be the best since you'd be legitimizing evil eithet way.
The barbarity of the US prison system is a feature, not a bug. Americans really seem to love exorbitant punishments, awfully similar to medieval Europe. Perhaps in a few centuries your culture will reach modern human rights standards.
Not really, wages make up a large portion of military expenditure and I don't think there are major differences between the individual "strength" of a soldier/engineer/whatever.
Sure, it would've just killed a few more million soldiers and civilians at minimum, who cares about lives anyways.
Nobody needs
over 400,000 jeeps and trucks; 12,000 armored vehicles (including 7,000 tanks, about 1,386[56] of which were M3 Lees and 4,102 M4 Shermans);[57] 11,400 aircraft (of which 4,719 were Bell P-39 Airacobras, 3,414 were Douglas A-20 Havocs and 2,397 were Bell P-63 Kingcobras)[58] and 1.75 million tons of food.[59]
in a war.
Also you failed to address the point: Was lend lease immoral because it "prolonged" the war?
But why, I don't think any artist has ever thought:
"Creating elevator music is so fulfilling! I would never take a different job and express myself in unique and creative ways, bland repeating background noise music is my passion!"
Uh isn't an easier explanation that society encourages people to get hobbies fitting their gender stereotype and discourages the opposite?
There is no dude stuff, there's what society thinks dude stuff should be and people raised as dudes are more likely to get hobbies matching these expectations.
I'll give you that, racism against brown muslims was the reason they were elected.
But this is not the first time a party was elected because of racism.
No one is winning elections campaigning on kicking out Slavs.
But parties have been compaigning against them. Take a look at how media was representing "Russian-Germans" in the early 90's. Spoiler: just the usual. "They're stealing social securities from families, getting everything handed to them....".
Or how populist media has portrayed Greeks after the financial crisis:
Sell your islands, bankrupt Greeks!
This is how Greeks are wasting [our] beautiful euros
You won't get anything from us!
Not a single drop of racism to be seen in here, nope.
Don't get me wrong, anti-Muslim and anti-brown racism is rampant in Europe.
But that's only a subset of European racism, racist Europeans despise any and all refugees, regardless of skin color because they despise amy culture different from their own. Perhaps for the first two months of the Russian war of aggression they pretended otherwise. Afterwards however, the same. Identical. Populist. Talking points. Were used as in 2015.
I suggest not parroting far right propaganda, thank you very much.
Also, perhaps don't apply fascist Poland, Hungary or Italy's behavior on the entire EU, there are many millions of Syrian, Iraqi and Afghani refugees in the EU.
Also, European racism is far more complex than white = good, brown = bad, like in the US. \
Nazis wanted to eradicate "white" Jews, "white" Romani and "white" Slavic people because of their ""race"". Do you seriously believe current day Nazis love the idea of Ukrainian immigrants? Have you actually seen how racist Germans treat Eastern European immigrant workers from Poland or Romania?
Why Does This Ad Capitalize Every Word?