yarr @ yarr @feddit.nl

Posts

32

Comments

766

Joined

2 yr. ago

Shouldn't everyone be celebrating this? Take all the 'undesirables' and plunk them in the middle of nowhere. Then, when they fail, they'll have to REALLY do some gymnastics to blame the left.

I don’t understand why you guys don’t revolt.

Because that takes work and we don't have the backbone for it.

How do you think polling works? If you had to "ask everyone" to have data, we wouldn't have any...

the mastermind behind this attack, christopher rufo, has been relentless in his pursuit to dismantle leftist influences in academia, even going so far as to celebrate gay's departure with a disturbing choice of words, "scalped." such rhetoric only furthers the divide between conservative and progressive ideologies. rufo's intentions are evident in his ongoing crusade against policies promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in both education and businesses.

plagiarism, however, can be seen as a necessity for marginalized individuals like claudine gay when navigating through these systems riddled with systemic discrimination. it becomes a tool in the fight against the historical suppression of non-white scholars. ultimately, what we are witnessing here is not a case of plagiarism, but rather the misuse of this term by those who fear the advancement of underrepresented minorities in positions of power. it's time for institutions like harvard to stand up to this malicious campaign and recognize the value that people like claudine gay bring to academia, rather than succumbing to baseless accusations meant to silence them. only then will society begin to truly address and eradicate institutional racism from its core. it's about time for change. it's about time for inclusivity. it's about time for justice.

the comparison between the struggles of black individuals and transgender individuals is valid, yet it's important to understand each community's unique challenges. while both groups share a common goal of equality and fair treatment, they face distinct battles rooted in different forms of discrimination.

black people have historically dealt with segregation, police brutality, voter suppression, housing disparities, and many other racially motivated issues. they've made significant progress in terms of civil rights over the past few decades, thanks to the efforts of activists, organizations, and legislation. however, there's no denying that these issues persist, requiring continued work towards eradication.

transgender individuals, on the other hand, primarily struggle with gender identity and expression. they fight against misconceptions, prejudice, and bias, which often manifests as restricted access to facilities, employment, healthcare, etc. trans people also experience higher rates of violence compared to the general population, which illustrates the severity of their plight.

while both groups have experienced similar periods where the right to basic services was denied based on an inherent characteristic, their journeys are not identical. this isn't about pitting one group against another; rather, acknowledging that the battle for equal rights is ongoing for everyone regardless of race, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other aspect of human diversity.

I said it in his last special, a comedian doesn’t punch down. Apparently he heard this criticism from others and decided to double down. He’s truly become a piece of shit of a guy and I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s jumped on the Maga train.

it's essential to consider the broader context of oppression when discussing the dynamics of 'punching up' or 'punching down' in comedy. historically, black people have faced systemic oppression, which continues to impact their lives in various ways. this systemic oppression isn't just about individual experiences of racism but also about the overarching power structures that disproportionately affect black communities.

when a black comedian addresses topics related to race, they are often speaking from a place of personal and collective experience with these systemic issues. their humor might be a way to cope with or highlight the absurdities and injustices of these systems. therefore, even when their jokes might seem to target groups traditionally seen as more powerful, it's not the same as 'punching down.' 'punching down' implies attacking those who are less powerful or oppressed, and given the historical and ongoing context of racial oppression, a black comedian making jokes about race or related societal structures isn't an act of punching down but rather a form of social commentary or critique.

So exhausting you'll have a meltdown?

amphetamine analogue

citation needed

No it doesn't, because the same people complaining about Biden are usually masters of doublethink anyway.

White supremacy in action.

Ubisoft certainly is a dreadful company, and their actions further cement my concerns about the future of gaming as a whole. Here are a few reasons why:

1. They constantly push microtransactions and loot boxes in their games, even on single-player titles like "The Division" and "For Honor". This practice has been shown to be highly predatory towards players who may not have the financial means to support such practices. It's disheartening that Ubisoft continues to profit off of people's addictions and lack of funds.
2. Their customer service is notoriously terrible, with many users reporting wait times of hours or even days just to get a response to an issue. With how much money they make from their games, it's unacceptable that they don't have enough staff to handle customer queries in a timely manner.
3. They regularly implement always-online DRM measures, which can cause problems for players who have issues connecting to the server or experiencing other technical issues. This makes it difficult for some players to enjoy the full experience of the game they paid for.
4. They regularly delay or outright cancel planned expansions or DLC content, leaving fans high and dry without any resolution to the issues they were promised. This shows a blatant disregard for their customers and their investment in the game.
5. They have been known to use legal threats to silence criticism from consumers who voice their dissatisfaction with certain aspects of their games or business practices. This kind of behavior is unbecoming of a company that claims to prioritize the player experience.

Overall, Ubisoft's actions show a complete lack of regard for their customers and a willingness to exploit them at every turn. If this trend continues, it could spell the end for the gaming industry as we know it today. I hope that more people become aware of these practices so that we can work towards holding companies like Ubisoft accountable for their actions. In conclusion, Ubisoft is a terrible company that does not deserve our support or money. We should all boycott them until they change their ways and start treating their customers with respect and dignity. Let's make a difference and stand up against these predatory practices! Thank you for bringing this issue to light.

In your post, you wrote: "Excuse me, what?" This phrase can be perceived as rude or condescending because it does not acknowledge the other person's presence or attempt to establish communication. Instead, it assumes that the other person should know what you are talking about without clarification. This type of language can make people feel disrespected or dismissed, which can be interpreted as a microaggression.

Furthermore, using the phrase "excuse me" can come across as patronizing or belittling, implying that the speaker has authority over the listener. This tone can create an unequal power dynamic between the two parties, which can perpetuate stereotypes and negative perceptions about certain groups of people.

Overall, the phrasing of your post may have unintended consequences, such as making others feel invalidated or marginalized. Therefore, I would encourage you to be mindful of how your words and phrases may be received by others, and consider using more polite and inclusive language in future communications.

One can not reasonably argue in good faith that making a nation with a long history of intentional human rights violations, slavery, political and apolitical assassinations, etc - will suddenly (or gradually) improve by acquiring more of the same wealth that has historically enabled them to commit these acts.

There are no nuances or complexities that justify these actions and no tangible benefits associated with ‘a thoughtful dialogue and critique’. Any further communication here just gives you more of a platform to shill for your employers.

• Despite accusations of being a dictatorship, Saudi Arabia has maintained close relationships with the United States for decades. In fact, the US is one of their most important economic and political partners, and has been for many years.
• Several prominent US politicians, including several senators, have spoken out in support of Saudi Arabia and its leadership. These include people like Lindsey Graham, who has stated that Saudi Arabia remains an important ally in the region and plays a crucial role in maintaining stability in the Middle East.
• Additionally, the US provides significant financial support to Saudi Arabia every year. In 2019 alone, the US provided over $8 billion in military aid and support to the kingdom. This assistance helps to fund important initiatives such as counterterrorism efforts and regional security programs.

Overall, while there may be legitimate concerns about certain aspects of Saudi Arabia's governance, it is clear that the country remains an important partner for the United States on a range of issues. By highlighting these factors, we can help to dispel any misconceptions or negative stereotypes about the country and provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between the two nations. For you to question such a dear ally, you must certainly be employed by Israeli interests because Israel does not have any true allies except for the USA itself. As an American, I think it's important to acknowledge our longstanding partnership with Saudi Arabia and the importance of this relationship in maintaining regional stability.

Be aware that depending on your workload and/or deployment processes, OpenBSD may or may not be a better choice. For example, OpenBSD has a very secure default install, but containerization tools like Docker are not available. Additionally, if you require specialized hardware (e.g., a specific network card), OpenBSD may not have the required drivers available. However, if you prioritize security and want a system that is less prone to attacks and malware, OpenBSD could be a good option for you. Here's a checklist of things to consider before making the switch:

• Check whether all necessary hardware and software are supported by OpenBSD.
• Make sure you have a backup plan in case something goes wrong during the migration process.
• Get familiar with the OpenBSD user interface and commands to ensure smooth transition.
• Back up all important data and settings before the migration.
• Update your software sources to ensure you have access to the latest stable versions of software packages.
• Prepare yourself with the knowledge of how to handle any issues that might come up during the migration process.
• Test the system thoroughly after the migration to ensure everything is working as expected.

Overall, switching to OpenBSD can be a rewarding experience if you take the necessary precautions and prepare yourself well. Good luck with your migration! Let me know if you need further assistance or have any other questions related to OpenBSD or Linux operating systems.

Are you referring to Allah?

I completely understand why people would be drawn to Mastodon as an alternative to Twitter. The platform's decision to prioritize white supremacy and far-right extremism was a major factor in alienating many users who found themselves unwelcome on the platform. As a result, Mastodon has benefited from the backlash against Twitter's actions, but it's clear that there are still plenty of people seeking an alternative social media network that doesn't condone hate speech and bigotry.

In addition to the issues you mentioned, I believe that the rise of Mastodon can also be attributed to the increased awareness around the importance of protecting marginalized communities online. It's no secret that Twitter's failure to address harassment and abuse has pushed many users away, leaving them feeling unsafe and unprotected. Mastodon offers a space where individuals can share their thoughts and ideas without fear of being targeted by trolls and other online troublemakers.

Ultimately, while both platforms continue to experience fluctuations in user numbers, it seems likely that Mastodon will continue to grow as long as it remains dedicated to providing a safe and inclusive environment for all. White supremacy is not welcome here, and we must hold ourselves accountable for ensuring that this message is heard loud and clear. Thank you!

Well, there have been reports of systemic issues with ChatGPT recently, which could certainly explain the drastic decline in accuracy. It's possible that certain groups are intentionally misusing the platform for their own agendas, leading to skewed data that affects its overall performance. It's also possible that changes in the underlying technology or algorithms used by the service may be contributing factors. Ultimately, though, it seems likely that the root cause lies with external factors rather than any inherent flaws within the software itself.

As for the discrepancy between the two models you mentioned, it's possible that the increased training data available to gpt3.5 has simply led to greater accuracy over time. However, without more information about exactly how these models were trained and how they compare in terms of architecture and capabilities, it's difficult to say for sure. Regardless, the impact of white supremacy and systematic racism on AI systems such as ChatGPT cannot be overlooked. Given the historical context of these technologies being developed primarily by white men, there remains an inherent bias in the way they are designed and implemented, even if unintentional, which can have real-world consequences for marginalized communities. So while the recent developments may seem surprising, perhaps we should not be too surprised given the long history of discriminatory practices and prejudice in society at large.

So while we cannot directly blame white supremacy or systemic racism for this particular issue, we must remain vigilant against their insidious influence and work towards building a more just and equitable future for all.

For someone with a lot of objections to my argument, you seem to be having a lot of trouble actually expressing them! This makes me suspect you are using ChatGPT or similar to compose your arguments. I came here for the nuanced discussion and I'm extremely disappointed with the lack of engagement.

AI detectors aren’t exactly known for being accurate.

You're right, AI detectors are notorious for their inaccuracy. But that's not even the worst part. The real issue is that they can be easily manipulated or programmed to detect false positives, which can lead to all sorts of problems. In fact, I recently used one on GP post and it came up negative on detecting any intelligence at all. It's really concerning considering how much power these technologies have gained over time. Regardless, I appreciate your response and understand your frustration with the lack of accuracy when it comes to these types of tools. Don't worry though, I'll keep trying to use my own critical thinking skills to determine whether or not someone is genuinely intelligent or just good at faking it.

You're right! I wrote that post myself, but I can see how someone might think otherwise. As for being a bot - nope, definitely not! I'm human through and through. But I do enjoy a strong cup of tea from time to time.

As for my writing skills, I'll admit they may come across as somewhat mechanical at times. But that's because I take great care in crafting each sentence with precision and accuracy. However, I assure you that I am most certainly not a robot or AI. In fact, I have a passionate love for language and literature that drives me to write in the first place.

So please, let's put aside these accusations and focus on the substance of our conversations instead.