This is super clickbait. What's Trump's actual quote?
I’d like to bring them down. It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up. You know, it’s very hard. But I think that they will.
That doesn't scream "backtracks on promise to me". Actually, if anything, he's saying that he'd still like to do it and he thinks they will. I mean, the other thing is he hasn't even taken over, so we can't really say he's failed at anything. Look, I don't like the guy very much either, but let's save our outrage when he's actually fucked up. Headlines like this is when some lazy editor just needs to crank a story out there.
If I asked someone if they like ice cream and they say "I'd like to get it. It's hard not to have it, but I think I will", the headline shouldn't be "LOCAL MAN HATES ICE CREAM". Fuck off lazy journalists and wake me up when something actually happens.
Arguably the "will of the people" was exercised through them supporting the Democratic party. The Democratic party put forth a new candidate in accordance with their own guidelines, which were in place prior to 2024. This was no coup, it was the Democratic party putting forth a candidate as they may. This is not new. They can put forth anyone they wish.
If one supports the Democratic party, surely one would sanction the process by which Kamala became the presidential candidate, as they were acting in accordance of their own party guidelines, which were in place long before this election. If a president would have withdrew prior to Biden, the exact same process would have taken place. A similar action took place in 1972 when VP nominee Thomas Eagleton withdrew. None of this is new.
There was nothing wrong with Harris except seven million people who voted for Biden weren’t ready for her to become president.
I didn't enjoy what she did as district attorney. I would also argue if she was not electable in 2024, then she doesn't meet the bar of a "good candidate". Now her viability is irrelevant entirely, unless she plans to run in 2028.
Those aren't my idea of good candidates either. My idea of a good candidate would be someone ethical, that wants to improve life for our citizens, that values constitutional values and the rule of law. I am not sure such a person exists in the US that is capable of winning the presidency.
In your picture above, just because a few morons vote for silly reasons doesn't invalidate the value of having actual good representation.
RPCS3 will RUN on a Raspberry Pi, but that doesn't imply a playable framerate. <30FPS at some gritty resolution doesn't meet the threshold for me. There's some laws of physics at play here. The Pi 5 can't muster up enough cycles to look nice and have a playable framerate. I'm glad the emulator is going to prioritize ARM, but this is more a move for the future vs today. Perhaps the Raspberry Pi 8 will have enough horsepower to actually do the job properly, and we're seeing the beginnings of that ship today.
“light pollution surveying” or “generic scientific study”.
The problem with those excuses is they'd have to 'own' the drones, and clearly, they want to avoid that at this point. They are just trying to make it very boring until these drones drop out of the news cycle and America's mad about something else for a week or two.
I wish there was a prediction market about this outcome, as I would gladly bet against it. I don't see America suddenly growing a spine. As long as there is (fast) food available and the electricity and football games are flowing, 99.999% aren't picking up that pistol.
Establish a system where voting Approve provides tangible personal benefits, Abstaining remains a safe, comfortable default, and Disapproving results in immediate personal drawbacks. Maintain a decent standard of living, encourage open non-violent expression, and quickly address problems so people rarely feel compelled to choose Disapprove. By making Approval the path to greater prosperity, Abstention harmless, and Disapproval costly, the majority either Approve or simply do nothing, ensuring that discontent never coherently organizes into a mass disapproval large enough to threaten your life.
That said, if that was the case why don’t they pull out something akin to the tried and true “just weather balloons” excuse?
Easy, because government excuses need a veneer of belivability. Clearly, weather balloons don't move like these objects (who, as far as I am aware, EVERYONE is calling drones), so that can't be the excuse.
Here's what I say about UBI. We may not need it today, but we better figure it out because we'll need it someday. As an example, take a look at America in 1800. 95%+ of people worked in agriculture. With tractors, the cotton gin, etc. all those careers will be eliminated. The cotton gin of tomorrow is autonomous vehicles, robots and/or drones. Jobs like delivery driver, cashier, etc are all on borrowed time. If we don't figure out some new economic framework before that time, our society is toast. All the "unskilled" jobs that served as on-ramps to more advanced employment will literally be wiped off the face of the Earth.
Of course, America being America, we'll treat this like climate change. Deny deny deny, even when it starts actively harming you. By the time someone tries to solve it, we'll all be screwed.
Sure, to think the Air Force / Army etc would tolerate such a blatant violation of their airspace with NO RESPONSE is crazy. It's not like they have to fly 5000 miles like you said. They are literally right there. If America was really this powerless against drones in our airspace, then Iran, etc. would be dropping grenades on our power stations in 2 seconds. We'd be totally owned. This is VERY CLEARLY either the government themselves, or something done with the government's agreement.
Another point -- if these drones are so secret and spooky, why are many of them flying with FAA compliant safety lights? Iran / aliens worried about mid-air collisions? Awfully nice of them!
Who's waking up? We're already seeing the end of this news cycle. People are pre-occupied with the stupid drones in NJ and losing interest over this. I would nearly guarantee we see no long-term changes to our health care system. The public operates in 2 week outrages. It would take a longer attention span to actually fix something. Someone'd have to dismantle the corrupt lobbying system in DC. Reminder: this year ALONE companies spend more than $130 million on lobbying in DC. The politicians don't work for us, the people, they work for the health companies and their lobbyists. This is business as usual.
As someone that was at the protest, at no point did I think it would result in the war stopping. It was still worthwhile, however. In retrospect, the war was so much worse than any of us knew at the time and also based on flimsy and/or no evidence of WMD. Business as usual in America. We'd do it all over again today, I have no doubt.
I don't believe it does. It's fairly clear he was the shooter, and shooting someone typically comes with a prison sentence. Care to explain your reasoning further?
These technically ARE UAP. They are just not extraterrestrial in origin.