This implies you started in the right (non-passing) lane and moved out of it to let them pass. Unless you're from a country that drives on the left, in which case sorry for the confusion.
What highways are there with a 100mph+ speed limit? I'd love to visit.
I thought the highest in the US was 80mph, which means at least 30mph over. I thought you could start getting your vehicle impounded and get reckless driving charges at that point. It's a little more than common speeding
I've been following this advice myself, but maybe with a bit of an ulterior motive... Being the second fastest car on the road, maybe a mile or two back from the fastest car on the road means they get pulled over and I don't.
(On a more serious note, I get my speed fix on the race track now. I've matured enough to realize speeding on public roads isn't worth the risks, especially when there's others on the road that could be affected)
It's like none of these people have taken road trips before. Depending on traffic density, you can be passing cars continuously for hours on a 4-lane highway (2 each direction).
If there's room to move to the right without slowing down, then yes, move over and cruise on the right lane. You don't need to weave in and out of the passing lane every single car you pass. If you can't stay in the right lane longer than 30 seconds before needing to pass again, it's really not worth switching unless there's someone behind you going even faster.
Did you get the lanes mixed up, or are you saying you're moving into the faster lane to let them pass you on the right?
Passing on the right may not be illegal in the US, but it's definitely less safe and it's illegal in parts of Europe.
I would never move left to let someone pass, if they can't figure out how to go around on their own, that's their problem.
This looks quite similar to the Japanese Gardens in Seattle! I didn't realize there were more in the PNW, I might have to do a trip down to Portland to check it out.
Anything that's per-commit is part of the "build" in my opinion.
But if you're running a language server and have stuff like format-on-save enabled, it's going to use a lot more power as you're coding.
But like you said, text editing is a small part of the workflow, and looking up docs and browsing code should barely require any CPU, a phone can do it with fractions of a Watt, and a PC should be underclocking when the CPU is underused.
It sounds like it does save you a lot of time then. I haven't had the same experience, but I did all my learning to program before LLMs.
Personally I think the amount of power saved here is negligible, but it would actually be an interesting study to see just how much it is. It may or may not offset the power usage of the LLM, depending on how many questions you end up asking and such.
I didn't even say which direction it was misleading, it's just not really a valid comparison to compare a single invocation of an LLM with an unrelated continuous task.
You're comparing Volume of Water with Flow Rate.
Or if this was power, you'd be comparing Energy (Joules or kWh) with Power (Watts)
Maybe comparing asking ChatGPT a question to doing a Google search (before their AI results) would actually make sense.
I'd also dispute those "downloading a file" and other bandwidth related numbers. Network transfers are insanely optimized at this point.
Phone numbers cost money, which means they're not easy to create in bulk, and therefore banning or blocking spam numbers is much easier than if it was open sign up.
Signal doesn't use SMS anymore, and all messages are sent over encrypted Internet protocol. Any servers in between won't see the phone number, it's not needed to deliver the message, it's using an IP address at that point and the entire message metadata is encrypted.
Signal is the only one that can see the phone numbers, which they use to identify multiple clients as a single user and route messages accordingly.
I don't think it would have to be any different than people getting a bigger tax return at the end of the year. Or like the HST rebates Ontario has been doing where they pay it out I think quarterly?
As it is right now, I've seen the occasional "tax return sale" because businesses know people just got paid a chunk of money and might be impulsive with it.
I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing, the demand for everyday items won't change, and people will try and save money regardless of income level.
You’re just saying, human-written software can have bugs.
That's pretty much exactly the point they're making. Humans create the training data. Humans aren't perfect, and therefore the AI training data cannot be perfect. The AI will always make mistakes and have biases as long as it's being trained on human data.
It's probably graded by a computer, and a) or d) is a fake answer, since the automated system doesn't support multiple right answers.
I'm going to go with 25% chance if picking random, and a 50% chance if picking between a) and d).
If it's graded by a human, the correct answer is f) + u)
I'm confused about this part:
This implies you started in the right (non-passing) lane and moved out of it to let them pass. Unless you're from a country that drives on the left, in which case sorry for the confusion.