'or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States'
well see, the thing is, the presidency is both civil and military... it doesn't say "and/or" so clearly it's an exclusive 'or' (aka xor) and exempt... - the super ream court
(that's cool... my environmental science teacher spent a minute on how volatile organic compounds (VOC's), such as gasoline fumes, are really bad for the environment, and most people don't operate the pump in the exact proper way to not release said fumes.... but gas station attendants are taught how, and that's why it's the law in oregon....
probably not the original reason it was a law in NJ in the 40's, sure...)
well that's crazy...
and got the vax earlier than most (got sorta a standby appointment for when higher risk people didn't show up)... and i got a booster...
i'm a very big fan of vaccines...
i'm still not a fan of the way the covid vaccine discussions were censored...
oh ive been there.
i had the manager at a mcdonalds refuse me once, so i ended up showing him the law on my phone... which didn't convice them... so i emailed corporate, who called me back, and the store... and then the store had the law printed on the window at the entrance...
the next time i tried it there, had to still get a manager who said "i'll just do it this one time"
and i kept letting him know that i know he has to every time...
Any gift certificate sold after January 1, 1997, is redeemable in cash for its cash value, or subject to replacement with a new gift certificate at no cost to the purchaser or holder.4 Effective January 1, 2008, any gift certificate with a cash value of less than $10 is redeemable in cash, which includes currency or check, for its cash value.
what??? no it wasn't. it was a plausible hypothesis.
That's how science works.
that is not how science works. science works by a free exchange of ideas
Unless an idea is supported by clear and sound evidence, it's untrue.
no. something can be completely true but not at all supported by evidence. You are confusing "truth" with "a broader scientific belief"
The lab leak theory can be misinformation at one point in time and viable at another point in time --
that doesn't make sense, and isn't what "misinformation" even means.
if I predicted heavy snowfall on a 74 degree day in June, it would very obviously be wrong. If I predict it for a 20 degree day in December however, it's actually plausible.
well that's the stupidest analogy i've ever read... the "date" and "temperature" of the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis didn't change.
It blows my mind that this is a novel concept for some people.
it blows my mind that you're patting yourself on the back for such utter drivel
things change over time.
for SOME TIME, it was treated as laughable misinformation, and directly censored... later it wasn't. (check out coverage on Jon Stewart when he talked about it when you weren't supposed to)
at a LATER TIME it was no longer bad to talk about it.
sorry you have no idea what's being discussed here.
im sorry if you really think that there was no censorship involving covid discussions online.
and i dont really care how silly you are.
it's all a direct ripoff from a japanese book and movie...