xavier666 @ xavier666 @lemm.ee

Just another Reddit refugee

---

Read more

Posts

20

Comments

1,165

Joined

2 yr. ago

My brother in Christ, do you think an average person knows what BIOS/boot menu are?

It's some sort of proprietary peer to peer algorithm

I completely lost interest for the project at this point of the text

I remember using it first on Google Talk. Good days.

Nooooo. If you do that, you won't be paying for Teams Premium which has built in support for screen recording. Think of the revenue lost 😭😭

Edit: I should add /s incase people think I'm a Microsoft shill

Very romantic. Down for it. Gunning for it.

Copilot: "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that"

These people have been stealing our pixels for so long. Have you seen how much China has been stealing? There memes are twice as large as ours. But everyone has been crying to me "Sir, but pixies aren't real." THEY ARE REAL!. My uncle has seen pixies. He was very smart, the smartest person I know perhaps. So from tomorrow, the pixel tariffs are being launched. Or pixies. I don't know, doesn't matter.

In capitalism, you get a bad crop

As per the article

on my own network a whopping 66.6% of all traffic is blocked

I stated it's actually 66.6% DNS requests being blocked, not the raw bandwidth utilization. Raw bandwidth savings (by not downloading the non-zero ads) would be much lesser.

Can't we be nicer on the internet?

Correct. The payload of DNS requests is tiny compared to, say requesting a webpage. So there might not be a huge decrease of bandwidth usage reduction. However, having 66.6% less DNS requests is still a win. The router/gateway doesn't have to work that hard because of the dropped requests.

Firefox: "But I'm nothing without Google money"

FOSS community: "If you're nothing without Google money, then you don't deserve it."

Issue resolved!

It was swhkd. Thank you very much for your insight and extremely detailed response!

    
$ ls -l $(which swhkd)
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 2583192 Mar 10 17:16 /usr/bin/swhkd

  

Since we know what's causing it, can you make a "guesstimate" of what it's doing? Why are other applications are getting infected by it? And why is a keybind manager affecting permissions?

I will raise an issue on their github. The project is already looking for maintainers.

How do you open the shell inside sway? Keyboard binding from sway config? Launcher? Which terminal? Do any of the involved programs have setuid root bit set (looks like rws instead of x in ls -l output)?

I think you may have just pointed me to the correct direction.

My keybinds setup is a bit weird. I'm using swhkd instead of sway's built in keybinds. swhkd is a setuid binary (https://github.com/waycrate/swhkd?tab=readme-ov-file#running) which might be causing the issue. I'll quickly disable swhkd and check if the issue is resolved. Will keep you posted.

    
$ which sway
/usr/bin/sway

$ sway --version
sway version 1.9

$ file $(which sway)
/usr/bin/sway: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, BuildID[sha1]=70fe358f7e410f618ad8a9ce0e573ed6826b2e75, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, stripped

$ ls -l $(which sway)
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 600352 Apr  1  2024 /usr/bin/sway

  

id pre and post login

    
uid=1000(xavier666) gid=1000(xavier666) groups=1000(xavier666),0(root)
---------------
uid=1000(xavier666) gid=1000(xavier666) groups=1000(xavier666),4(adm),24(cdrom),27(sudo),30(dip),46(plugdev),120(lpadmin),132(lxd),133(sambashare)

  

A funny thing; I think this has nothing to do with gdm. I have gdm disabled now and launching sway directly from the terminal and the issue still persists.

The problem goes away (xavier666 becomes part of sudo like expected) when I type exec su - xavier666 for that terminal session only. If I open a new terminal, it problem reappears. I'll just in case check if zsh/omyzsh is doing something funny.

I was experimenting. This might be helpful (https://lemm.ee/post/62662283/20097388)

I found something interesting, thanks to my friend

• I removed the fix mentioned above. Now user does not have sudo access inside sway
• I ran the command exec su - xavier666. It asked for my user password and the command was accepted.
• My groups output looks normal (xavier666 is now part of sudo) and my permissions are fine
• However, the problem reappears after a reboot

It is as if this user is an imposter with incorrect privileges 📮

I did it. The issue still lingers. Check my last comment for output.

Great suggestion. I tried this method just now.

Unfortunately, I'm still getting the same bug.

The main difference between the two sessions is the output of the groups command

In pure tty

    
$ groups
xavier666 adm cdrom sudo dip plugdev lpadmin lxd sambashare

  

The moment I enter into sway from inside the tty

    
$ groups 
xavier666 root

  

Now you know why your mom spent so much time with the Amiga

!lemmysilver