Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
3
Comments
1,753
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Ok, but now we're changing the context, and we're back to my original point: Making Windows work for you is possible, and roughly as hard as making the switch to Linux.

    But complaining that power-user functioanlity isn't easy is just... asinine. If you understand the underlying design, it becomes awfully obvious that Microsoft is far more lazy than malicious. Same end result, but it helps make the entire process of using and configuring Windows make a lot more sense.

    Yeah, Linux is obviously the better choice long term. But "fixing" Windows isn't impossible, and switiching to Linux isn't a "it just works" experience. Simple shit like HDR support still isn't as plug and play as it "should" be.

    So seeing people wrongly claim that doing certain things with Windows is literally impossible while they talk about dealing with similarly complex shit in Linux is frustrating. If you can do X in Linux, you are more than capable of doing Y in Windows.


    You're not wrong. It shouldn't be necessary to tell Microsoft to fuck off at all. It's not an unreasonable desire to want Microsoft to fuck off with their anti-consumer bullshit.

    All I'm saying is that the skills needed to make Windows work for you are roughly equivalent in difficulty to getting Linux to work for you.

    Both take work, and knowledge about the underlying design to do properly. The asinine "hot takes" from both sides are largely fuelled by people spouting off without the background knowledge to understand why things are designed how they are.

  • complete asshole to comment based on assumptions and allegations like this in an arrogant tone that tries to hide the hollow incompetence that's behind it.

    Go fuck yourself. You don't know me, and if you cared more than trying to make a cheap shot at someone for daring to call Windows passable you would see that scattered through my posting history there's more than enough evidence that I know what the fuck I speak of.

  • It is super easy, if you stick within the boundaries of the absolute most basic use cases. If you're a normal user, which is what Linux evangelists insist Linux is ready for despite persistent edge cases with hardware support.

    If you think ripping out the default web browser (which is used behind the scenes as a system component for a ton of OS level shit) is a "normal user" action, then you're already operating outside of their target demographic and well into the "you can figure it out yourself bucko" realm.

    Even installing a different browser beside Edge is farther than 90% of users will ever consider going.

    It's very easy from a position of tech knowledge to assume that the average user is a hell of a lot more saavy than they are. Go spend some time working IT support and you'll be violently stripped of that notion. Fucking professional coders, good coders, that can't navigate basic settings menus. Who don't use adblocking plugins. It's crazy.

    But anyway, replacing the browser (and still leaving Edge installed) is as simple as installing your browser of choice, then going to Default Apps and switching it off Edge to what you want to use. Yes, it gives you a completely un-needed "are you sure" prompt. No, I've never had it reset that setting on me after an update.

    The only default app setting I've had issues with is Edge taking over as default PDF reader after some updates, and that stopped happening well over a year ago.


    This is the type of shit I'm talking about. Yes, it's some dumb as shit OS design to so tightly couple the web browser into the rest of the OS.

    But the "gotcha" from Linux users is "Well if Windows is meant to be so easy to use for normal people, why can't I rip out a critical OS component easily?"

    Because it's a critical OS compenent you dolt.

    You aren't asking about using Firefox here, you're asking about something akin to changing the BT stack handler, the TCP/IP stack, or the CPU scheduler. All things you can do on Linux, but not normal end user shit.

  • Welcome to discussions about Windows on Lemmy. Rather than learning how to properly use Windows, a lot of people around here will blame operator error on the OS and just jump ship to Linux at the first stumbling block. They'll claim something incredibly simple to work around simply isn't possible.

    If you frequent computer discussion around here you'll find yourself asking this a lot: "If you couldn't handle [complicated to access but easy to do Windows thing], how in the hell are you managing Linux?"

    And a lot of the most outspoken against Windows here legitimately have not used it in over five years, yet speak as if they are up to date experts.


    Relatedly: 99% of the "The sky is falling! Microsoft adds more ads to Windows!" articles thrown around on Lemmy are shit that is managed by ONE singular Settings menu option for all of them that (despite everyone's insistence to the contrary) does NOT get silently reset during updates. But you'll see everyone talking about the ads like they're completely unavoidable and re-enable themselves if you press spacebar too hard.


    Linux is awesome, 99% of the issues to work around in Windows simply shouldn't exist in the first place, and don't there.

    But it's still far from a smooth experience for non-technical users.

    That said, for people who don't want to learn how something works and just want it to work, there's a compelling argument that copying and pasting random terminal lines off the internet is faster than trying to follow instructions guiding you through an unfamiliar UI. It's more opaque as what it's doing, and a lot easier to just fuck your install, but it can appear like less work in the short term.

    For people open to learn though, I maintain that truly learning how to manage your linux distro install (instead of just being a copy paste warrior) is about as difficult as learning how to manage a Windows install properly.

  • I find that SnapCube's real time fandubs of games tend to have similar energy. Little more obviously ad-lib though.

  • That's the basis for this lawsuit though. Reddit adjusted its ToS to forbid anyone but their explicitly approved business partners to scrape Reddit data.

    I believe Google is the only company legally allowed to scrape Reddit data for AI training usage. Anthropic isn't.

  • ADHD and programming is a fun mix.

    "We do this because once it's automated it'll be so much faster, I swear! We'll make up the dev time in... 5 years if no further adjustments are needed"

  • I really don't get the family persona bit here. Yes, it's "a thing", but this happened at a Tenacious D concert. His definitively not child friendly persona singing songs like "Fuck her gently".

  • I did naht hit her. I did naht!

  • Can't forget coontown in that mix either.

    As much as I hate what reddit has become, it's kind of an amazing example of media coverage manipulation and PR.

    All that heinous shit on it and they still had the kind of celebrity AMAs they did.

  • Hey, is your wife free later? I could really use some German lessons. I mean German less- I mean German- I mean Ger- I-I-I mean light domming.

  • If they get rid of the skirts, how are the police women supposed to stop everyone from seeing their underwear?

    Does Japan's perversion know no limits?

  • That's quite a small view of temples. Seems mainly restricted to stereotypes of Catholic/Christian abuses.

    There's a whole world worth of shitty religious/spiritual practices you could be overgeneralizing!

    What about ritualistic animal sacrifice? Burning of fragrant herbs and psychedelics while causing intentional heat stroke? Drinking "tea" mixed with blood and drugs and having delerious orgies masquerading as spiritual awakenings? Combat to the death? Bloodletting? We could get all the strong men together and make the youngin's drink their semen for strength! We could have young women go streaking while guys chase them around with whips!

  • Yes, but it still deserves the question to be asked explicitly. I don't think most iPhone users looking for a music reccomendation app would assume they'd need to selfhost in order to use an app.

    And again, if as the dev he's not prepared to set up his own server for use to pass basic testing, it begs the question of what exactly he's expecting out of his end users and if it's truly a reasonable ask even if they're prepared to self host

  • Wait, how is this app going to function on release if you can't stand up the basic resources for it to function for them to test it? Every user has to self host their own?

    Which brings up another issue: if there isn't an easy way for you to secure the server as the developer, is it fair for you to just dump all that on your end users?

  • This is just "android sticks allow sideloading apps". Nothing Amazon specific to any of this.

  • Lately Ars Technica seems quite intent on losing any quality they had.

    What kind of boot licking, inaccurate, non-news shit is this?

    The only potential reason for this article is farming engagement bait clicks from people who don't know shit about fire sticks, and from people like us stunned at the stupidity.

  • Holy shit, formal disclosure of potentially ongoing incidents within four days? With unclear and complicated specific disclosure requirements spread across multiple legalese government documents?

    My knee-jerk was "duh, of course they don't want to disclose", but there's some legitimate reason for pushback here.