Probably because a lot or them (especially _iel) use literal letteral translations, nobody in their right mind would use in everyday conversations. Like in this post with "michmichs".
That's not why JS is a big pile of crap. It's because the language was not thought through at the beginning (I don't blame the inventors for that) and because of the web it spread like wildfire and only backwards compatible changes could be made. Even if will all your points in mind the language could be way nicer. My guess is that once wasm/wasi is integrated enough to run websites without JS (dom access, etc.) JS will be like Fortran, Cobol and Telefax - not going away any time soon, but practically obsolete.
In theory you can because the second law is actually a statistical and probabilistic thing. Currently it looks like that the laws of physics are time direction independent. So if you play a physics simulation forwards and backwards you couldn't tell the difference for a small number of particles so it it actually can (and does on very small time scales) happen that entropy decreases.
"Amazingly" fast for bio-chemistry, but insanely slow compared to electrical signals, chips and computers. But to be fair the energy usage really is almost magic.
But by that definition passing the Turing test might be the same as super human intelligence. There are things that humans can do, but computers can't. But there is nothing a computer can do but still be slower than humans. That's actually because our biological brains are insanely slow compared to computers. So once a computer is better or as accurate as a human it's almost instantly superhuman at that task because of its speed. So if we have something that's as smart as humans (which is practically implied because it's indistinguishable) we would have super human intelligence, because it's as smart as humans but (numbers made up) can do 10 days of cognitive human work in just 10 minutes.
AI isn't even trained to mimic human social behavior. Current models are all trained by example so they produce output that would score high in their training process. We don't even know (and it's likely not even expressable in language) what their goals are but (anthropomorphised) are probably more like "Answer something that humans that designed and oversaw the training process would approve of"
To be fair the Turing test is a moving goal post, because if you know that such systems exist you'd probe them differently. I'm pretty sure that even the first public GPT release would have fooled Alan Turing personally, so I think it's fair to say that this systems passed the test at least since that point.
I'm not sure if "strongest currency" is a good wording here because the absolute exchange rate has nothing to do with how strong a currency is. It's the relative exchange rate (what was the exchange rate last year and what is it know) that would be a better fit to gauge how "strong" a currency is.
I'm pretty sure the mobile teams UI is also just web stack with a webview wrapper. They want you to use the app so you have to install intune and to get deeper into your system.
Look at his arm. Unless all the videos of that guy are fake (even during a time where making a convincing video fakes was really hard). That arm is not going down even if he wanted.
Needs more watermarks