Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WI
Posts
0
Comments
947
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Water bowls are stagnant water and animals can sense that and do not like it. In nature, stagnant water is dangerous and kind of a last resort. Heck, even humans can taste this and probably don't like it. Try leaving a bowl of water out for 24 hours and drink it yourself, you might be able to tell it's not good.

    Fountains keep that water tasting fresh, though tbh they might fill it with micro plastics or something so who knows if it's really an improvement.

  • If the dude was threatening the cops with a knife there's no way they would have let the knife out of their sight. I doubt there ever was a knife, and if there ever was it sounds like they abandoned the weapon to go kill the guy.

  • Generally i don't think they catch too many people this way. If they had they certainly would have been talking that up during the Bush administration when they were looking for anything they could find to hype up the terrorist threat but they barely ever had anything to show for it. Some shoe bomb thing that didn't even work, i guess.

    Meanwhile, it's well known that this stuff fails to catch weaponry and other dangerous objects regularly. I could link a story but i, myself, experienced this once: I forgot to take a 4" knife out of my backpack before flying and sure enough, they didn't find it even though they "randomly selected" me for a manual search. (They were too distracted by the multiple laptops and phones is my only guess, but the knife was buried in there deep and i didn't find it when packing either.)

    I didn't even notice until i was already at my destination and so i didn't have much choice but to bring it back through security a second time and hope they didn't catch it. Sure enough, they missed it the second time.

    Fundamentally, the TSA is an organization that tries to replace skill and attention with technocratic rules following but you'll never have a successful security operation that way. This isn't the fault of the people doing the work, they're treated like McDonald's employees but they're being asked to hassle everyone safeguard our flights. The primary motivating factor for this appears to be fear--both fear of bad things happening and a desire to instill that fear in others. That is also not an effective organizing principle for a security operation.

    Why the tracking, then? That's simple: it, too, is theater but it's also a form of control. It gives the state more insight into and control over our personal lives.

  • That's not affected by the relatively serious issues plaguing more recent Intel CPUs so it's probably fine. If it was the more recent generations, there are some major and probably physical defects causing problems for those.

  • Nuclear war has been mentioned a couple times but i feel it deserves elaboration: We've been real fucking close a couple times. There was a Soviet "nuclear counterattack station", or whatever, that got the "nuclear strike detected, fire retaliatory missiles" signal and the person responsible simply refused. The signal was due to a glitch, there was no attack. That guy probably saved millions and millions of lives by refusing to carry out his duty.

    If you consider (potential) timelines being "close" to ours in terms of only a small number of things needing to change to get us there, the one where everything went to nuclear hell is very close to ours--but we're not in that one.