Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
0
Comments
72
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Keep in mind that most of the people in this instance of Lemmy that are going to reply to you are actively hoping for Biden (and for that matter, America) to lose.

    While it’s absolutely your right to research and find a candidate that aligns with your beliefs, I hope you take most of the replies here with a grain of salt.

  • The Palestinians are obviously losing. Why don’t they cut their losses and negotiate? /s

  • I never said that Ukrainians must only identify as Ukrainians, just that it is the reason why folks outside of Kyiv choose to fight. Do not put words into my mouth.

  • Wow, you’re right! You have found the one chink in my armor that completely tears down my statement!

    The Romanovs must all be British now.

    The Dalai Lama must be American.

    Lana Peters is Russian. So are all Ukrainians and Tatars that were forced to migrate.

    Pack it up folks, by the decree of Nekandro, you can never be part of multiple tribes or switch ever!

  • Uh, because they are all within one nation. They identify as Ukrainians.

    You could transmute your statement to any other nation and it would be the same. Why do the people in Archangelsk fight for Moscow? Why do the people in Wichita fight for Washington?

    Tribalism is an innate feature of the human experience.

  • I read the article, it didn’t propose any solutions, just an opinion that the US should withdraw from their closest allies in the region.

    That doesn’t sound like a tenable option, particularly when there’s real opportunity for these nations to have actual normalized relationships and be a counterbalance to Iran and China in the region.

    A major world shipping lane goes through there, and of course, the area is also resource rich. I don’t foresee the US abdicating their stance as the guarantor of free trade; it would be geopolitically dangerous (and clueless) to do so.

    What’s more, the author doesn’t address that the current foreign policy - up until recently, and may again still - worked pretty well for the west. Oil flowed and ships sailed. Incursions primarily stayed within the region. A perfectly ideal solution? Of course not, but utopias are exceptionally rare throughout history.

    And yes, the headline is clickbait. It infers that the multi-decade US strategy is wrong, but then mentions in multiple instances, that the strategy hasn’t yet had a chance to play out due to foreign actors. Shouldn’t we fully test the experiment first before doing a 180 and snubbing our allies in the region?

  • I mean, like every tool, it serves a purpose. It’s just that in this case, they are using a really large hoe and pretending it’s the biggest and best shovel.

    Petrostates and nations that are heavily reliant on one primary industry tend to have high PPP, look at Gabon, Brunei and Kuwait as oil examples or Bahamas, Antigua and Barbuda and Syria for other examples.

  • Thank you comrade, may your bread lines always be full. Na Zdorovie

  • Maybe it was sold by the generals, and so the soldiers doing the actual fighting on the ground received inferior equipment, if any at all!

    Oh no wait, that was Russia.

    Am I doing whataboutism right?

  • Subsidies - Unrestricted Capitalism

    Choose one.

  • Their implies ownership, or are you using it to be cheeky? It's in your second comment too.

  • Speak softly and carry a big stick.

  • To name a few:

    • moon landing
    • banning CFCs
    • German purity law
  • I agree with your sentiment that Israel has a right to defend itself. That said, I think the reason folks are saying you’re wrong is because Israel just bombed the hell out of Gaza, which killed fighters and civilians alike.

    You don’t have to call it genocide, but killing indiscriminately is a pretty thin line.

  • I want to converse in a place where most people are civil and tolerant of ideas even if these ideas challenge their view of the world. People don't have to agree, but I think most people should be treated with dignity and respect. Further, I would love to converse in place where people are rational actors and free thinkers, rather than just simply aligned and regurgitating their group's thought leaders' talking points. A place where people have been taught the scientific method, fallacies, how to discern most propaganda and advertising, and also have at least a minimum understanding of philosophy, psychology and sociology.

    In other words, I want to converse in a complete fantasyland.

    Joking aside, these arts were once taught to all students at most universities. I'm not sure if they are anymore, but the news paints a picture that they've been exchanged for more "employable" skills. I hope to see more pushback against those efforts.

  • But weirdly enough, the French transferred New Orleans ownership over to Spain so that it wasn’t lost as a spoil of war. The Spanish then governed it for 40 years before it was given back and then promptly sold to the US.