wildbus8979 @ wildbus8979 @sh.itjust.works

Posts

24

Comments

2,244

Joined

2 yr. ago

The next US tanks is supposed to be a disele electric hybrid actually. But I'm not saying this because I think it'll be some sort of improvement. It's just interesting that they think that is the superior tech.

War releases MASSIVE amounts of CO2 and green house gasses and destroys casts swaths of green spaces.

That's your answer.

I certainly have that state deep somewhere...

Before sanding, seeing the age of the building, and considering this is exterior paint. Make sure there isn't a layer of lead paint in the mix.

Don't get swabs they suck. Either get it tested by a lab, or get a methylammonium bromide based detector from detectlead.com or similar.

I'm old

The Sony rootkit was 20 years ago!

Fun fact, the gas chambers were inspired by America's gasoline baths for Latin Americans.

WebDAV would work. Mounts directly in the Finder in MacOS.

Sad, I hope they are angry at the Israeli colonial project for having started another war.

Unfortunately personally knowing far too many Ukranian/Israeli dual citizens, I highly doubt it. They see Israel as the victim without a shred of self awareness.

Unfortunately I have also found it to be a huge impediment to making friends with other millennials who aren't techie. I sort of left a crowd that was always on xmpp and signal and found myself rather ostracized. Things are changing slowly and most of them are now on Signal and with the usernames it's easier to exchange contact without relying on phone numbers that feel like a bigger commitment. But unfortunately passed explaining why you won't support Meta, and why alternatives like Signal are good there isn't much to do.

Don't UN peacekeepers require both party consent or a UN security Council resolution? I don't see either Israel, nor the US, ever agreeing to that since that would go against their genocidal plan.

These are all key figures in the establishment of the state of Israel.

"We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population. ' Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them out!" - Yitzhak Rabin

This is the Zionist goal.. it couldn't be any clearer than it is.

My point of view couldn't be more clear. The state of Israel as it exists must be dismantled and a single state of equal rights for all must be established. The right to returned of the millions of Palestinians refugees must be complied with, and reparations should be paid.

Yours on the other hand seems to be vague handwaiving of Zionist propaganda.

If that were the case then a state formed after conquest would be legitimate. But it clearly isn't.

Feel free to refer to Francesca Albanese, lawyer and scholar of internal law and current UN rapporteur for more question. I have no doubt that she is just vaguely more competent (and clearly more morally correct) than you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlbFSpNASO4

Zionist leaders and terrorists such as Ben Gurion, Moshe Sharett, the list goes on and on.

"We must expel Arabs and take their places...and, if we have to use force... then we have force at our disposal." - Ben Gurion

"The compulsory transfer of the [Palestinians] from the valleys of the proposed Jewish state could give us something which we never had, even when we stood on our own during the days of the first and second Temples. We are given an opportunity which we never dared to dream of in our wildest imaginings." - Ben Gurion

"In many parts of the country new settlement will not be possible without transferring the [Palestinian peasants]... Jewish power, which grows steadily, will also increase our possibilities to carry out the transfer on a large scale." - Ben Gurion

"With compulsory transfer we [would] have a vast area [for settlement]. I support compulsory transfer. I don't see anything immoral in it." - Ben Gurion

"After the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the [Jewish] state, we shall abolish partition and expand to the whole of the Palestine" - Ben Gurion

"[the indigenous Palestinian population was akin to] the rocks of Judea, as obstacles that had to be cleared on a difficult path." - Chaim Weizmann

"With regard to the refugees, we are determined to be adamant while the war lasts. Once the return tide starts, it will be impossible to stem it, and it will prove our undoing. As for the future, we are equally determined to explore all possibilities of getting rid, once and for all, of the huge [Palestinian] Arab minority [Palestinian Israeli citizens of Israel] which originally threatened us. What can be achieved in this period of storm and stress [the 1948 war] will be quite unattainable once conditions get stabilized. - Moshe Sharett

"...the transfer of [Palestinian] Arab population from the area of the Jewish state does not serve only one aim--to diminish the Arab population. It also serves a second, no less important, aim which is to advocate land presently held and cultivated by the [Palestinian] Arabs and thus to release it for Jewish inhabitants." - Yosef Weitz (JNF)

"It must be clear that there is no room in the country for both peoples...If the Arabs leave it, the country will become wide and spacious for us...The only solution is a Land of Israel...without Arabs...There is no way but to transfer the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to transfer all of them, save perhaps for [the Palestinian Arabs of] Bethlehem, Nazareth, and the old Jerusalem. Not one village must be left, not one tribe." - Yosef Weitz

Is that clear enough for you? Probably not, no amount of evidence can defeat a zealot's cognitive dissonance.

Except it isn't. They are two different legal concepts.

Whether or not they have achieved their goal doesn't change the fact that is the stated goal.

That's just not true. State exists or they don't de facto. Self determination applies to people, not states. States have a right to territorial integrity, aka not getting attacked, but that's it.

No I think the question of why Israel is an apartheid state is indeed the point.

It's interesting you would make this point, since there is no right to for a given state to exist in international law. There's a right to self determination. But that is not the same thing.

You're mosfeaming the question..why do they exist under a different set of laws? Why do they have different IDs, even license plates? Sure they exist... But they absolutely do not exist in a state of equal rights.