Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WI
Posts
2
Comments
564
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • In fact, you're helping them promote their stuff. E.g. everyone is watching that TV show and it's all your friends are talking about. Now you have to do it too.

    If instead of pirating you'd be like "I think it's extremely expensive to pay a subscription fee for this low tier content, so instead I've been reading X". Maybe you'd convice someone to join you. But for now you're just reinforcing the media monopoly.

  • Yarrr

    Jump
  • Classic lemmy logic. Lemme say something ridiculous, but it's "capitalism bad", so everyone will upvote.

    You're playing a game, or watching a movie made by labor. Highly qualified and paid labor.

    All those involved in the production could easily go and make their own company and do their own movies/games. And they often do. But you keep pirating AAA titles and Hollywood produced movies instead of paying for indie games and watching independent cinema.

    That's because deep in your soul you're a capitalist hoe, you're just also a poor joe, but somehow you need to rationalize.

    You want the system of capitalist abuse in the media industry to end? Instead of pirating, stop consuming for-profit media, and take your hard earned cash to support independent creators.

    Piracy helps that capitalist system. Cuz they'll abuse everyone they can, and those who can't will illegally use the results anyways. And this way no independent market will ever form.

    You're not a warrior of freedom, anon. You're a corpo sucker, just a poor one.

  • It's obvious that stars provide obscene, unimaginable amounts of energy. It's also clear that this energy can be captured and stored.

    We, currently, can't exit our orbit without using oil, but that does not mean it's theoretically impossible.

  • ITT: a collective beating up of the OP.

    btw, OP, I pirated like half a terabyte of FLACs (and when not available mp3s) back in my days. And also never heard of this term. Sounds like you're just a bad pirate.

  • Sure, but it's a private coffee shop, and they can just simply not let you in without paying or in headphones. They need to make money.

    So, at first your clever trick works. But once everyone is doing it, their advertisers stop paying them, so now someone's gotta pay for the coffee somehow.

  • Oh gosh, look, an AI believer.

    No, LLM will not lead to AGI. But even if they did, applying existing tech to a new problem only to fail cuz you're dumb at estimating the complexity does not, in fact, improve the underlying technology.

    To paraphrase in a historical context: no matter how many people run around with shovels digging the ground for something, it will never lead to an invention of the excavator.

  • A bunch of people fine-tuning an off-the-shelf model on a proprietary task only to fail horrendously will never lead to any progress, let alone AGI.

    So, nobody is trying AGI.

    If all those people would actually collectively work on a large-scale research project, we'd see humanity advance. But that's exactly my point.