wewbull @ wewbull @feddit.uk

Posts

0

Comments

2,104

Joined

2 yr. ago

Not as an independent, no, but he could form the Recyclon party with a few of his kin.

Whoops. I read it as 14.2 and rounded down.

Still... it's all totally above board and I'm not expecting US arms to appear in Iran or Russia.

I agree with what you're saying, that the attack didn't require any data breach to take place, but I do have one slightly pedantic point.

Codeberg being non-profit does not make the employees "volunteers". They are normal employees and take a wage like working for any other company. What's different is that any excess revenue over costs must be used to continue the company's objectives and is not able to be taken by the company owners as profit.

That's the same Saudi Arabia that Trump has just signed a $14bn arms deal with?

Arming the Saudis. What's the worst that could happen?

Here's hoping the court sees through the rather obvious bullshit.

Yes. Count Binface could too.

The best gifts are ones where they've anticipated your needs, wants, or desires. These are exceedingly rare though, and are never found in a last minute dash to wherever is open.

My brother, sister, and I have a deal. No fixed date gifts, but you don't need an excuse to get someone a gift when you've got a good idea.

Considering he's barely been in 100 days, 90 days is forever.

It's not a modern mining operation.

Well it's fracking

All the EDA tools for silicon design are Linux based.

• US put up tariffs
• Chine put them up in response
• They now both drop them for 90 days

Nothing has been achieved.

What goal are we closer to? What does Trump want to get out of these negotiations?

So what has changed from before all of this? What have they agreed to that makes this all worth while?

My company is transitioning to teams. Most of our engineering is on Linux.

Can Microsoft please hurry up and break teams so we can't transition?

The oil price.

It's a response to Putin demanding Ukraine not be resupplied by it's allies. An equally pointless demand that the Europeans are saying "No!" to.

My heart stops after every beat. Fortunately it has always started again before the next one....so far.

Fine, but I hope you're taking a few seconds to understand why the error message you received came from the the syntactic mistake you fixed.

A single Vs double quote mistake should be 5 seconds from error message to fix, with a thought process like:

• "Unable" is illegal key-word on line 163
• Go to line 163 - "Unable" is the first word of a string...oh the previous string must not be closed correctly.
• Find previous string on line 154. There it is - the wrong quote mark.

If you don't learn what the error message is telling you, you will be forever doomed take time to cut'n'paste code into an LLM. It might save you time today because that thought process takes you 2 mins not 5 seconds, but that's not the level you want to stay at.

Or emacs