Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WE
Posts
19
Comments
1,693
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I don’t see why the /s if you are prideful enough to display a flag on a wall at least make it look like not crap.

    That these particular flags are from harmful ideology is sad but does not counter this.

    Its tripple sad.

    • nazi is always sad
    • no flag respect sad
    • probably think ironing is for women and afraid to do it sad.
  • “made clear they will not support his sweeping domestic agenda focused on both cutting taxes and increasing spending.”

    Here is the thing. This isn’t politics but children fighting.

    Musk was supposed to run the department that cuts everywhere it could to give more space for thins like tax cuts for the undeserving.

    That failed and doge actually costed way more than it ever saved.

    So now Trump is upset with Musk for not giving enough breathing room but going through with the original plan. While Musk tries to deflect everything asap before people realise its his own incompetence that put them in that situation.

    Thank god the fascists don't have enough braincells to do worse.

  • Claude definitely has its impressive moments where it calls out something inaccurate.

    It’s also way less sycophantic, mature and better for light coding.

    My only issue is that the servers are sometimes slow and so is the ios app which frequently trows an error after 2 minutes if waiting.

  • I’ve wondered about this.

    I cant believe that somehow everything except lemmy got infected. There must exist some ai comments here but i have not noticed them…

    Of course its better not do dwell on this to much or paranoia quickly sets in.

  • You might have more technical knowledge about this than i do. I never considered a blockchain versus the blockchain. But your brief explanation does make sense.

    But yes, the potential i saw in it is in a decentralised network of verification that no one party can control.

  • This is correct.

    This is a flaw i had considered and never found a solution for. Hence the idea is unfinished.

    The only further argument i have is that manipulating camera techniques is as old as film yet it’s the digital tools that are causing the most harm and allow any troll to partake. Staging a scene takes at least some dedication and effort.

    If such would be considered on the blockchain than it would also bring in questions all other footage by the same recorder device. “Wallets” from established authors, anonymous or not would have their own reputations of trustworthyness.

  • Not at all. I consider journalists the best potential of early adapter.

    As a consumer i don't care if i have to copy or screenshot or need to list sources if i am Just sharing to friends.

    Publishers however have a responsibility towards the public to provide fair information. And if i post publicly i also try to pay a bit more attention. (Ignoring i failed exactly that just earlier today)

    There would be nothing stopping anyone to ignore the system and keep sharing unverified pixels but its a real flex be able to provide open and transparent information about your sources almost upfront.

    If enough established organisation start doing this then the ones that don’t will stick out like they have something to hide.

    The exposé is an interesting example I had not yet considered but again i think nothing is stopping publishers from publicly stating they cannot provide sources but have the means to get it independently verified.

    I also believe its possible for a camera/recorded to exist anonymously on the blockchain, just like you don't know the owner of a crypto wallet.

  • It would but it would be much easier to find/link and compare with the actual original.

    Of course i have mentioned this was never a complete finished idea, just some thoughts i had for years.

    Nowadays i can conceptualise ai tools that detect near duplicates but those obviously were not a thing when i first came up with this.

    I would hope that it would be considered very damning if an official publishers referred to false footage while having all the tools to find and refer to the original. So would it Be damning for the uploader and all footage recorded with their device.

  • One would assume that journalism would be more then motivated to proof authenticity of the images they show.

    Of course such assumptions fail to consider the events at cern that fucked up any chance of reasonable reality.

  • Did you reply to the wrong comment?

    The problem is “misinformation” and has been since before nft/genai became a thing.

    Gen Ai makes misinformation worse but the event that sparked this was a gop shared video of a democrat which was slightly speed up to seem more aggressive.

    Also simple framing to cut off context from the original has been a very common form of misinformation for decades.

  • Exactly my point why i think they would be a part of it.

    Too often information about original media and potential hashes get lost. A decentralised ledger is the perfect tool for the job.

  • Generally frowned upon during live filming.

    You can arrive on set high as you like though as long as the stuff on camera is fake.

    There have been a very few cases with real cannabis and i presume many with alcohol.

    You could chalk this up to them keeping it secret but they often talk openly about cocaine around the set it be bizarre that using it on scene would not leak.

  • I was actually going to note that i feel similar about this conspiracy but i left it out in the end.

    Glad not to be the only person to conceive this. Kill it before people discover a good use.

  • Those would probably be a part of it.

    Comparing a hashcode implies you have a verifiable source for the original footage.

    You can do this manually and dig for the author but thats not always that simple.

    A second step would be to build In a reference to the record in each media file, expressed as a small clickable logo.

    You grandma deserves to be capable to verify.