wabafee @ wabafee @lemmy.world

Posts

13

Comments

554

Joined

2 yr. ago

Fair point, thanks!

It reads like a cocktail instruction, "Add mint then mix Linux"

Firehose

Your right privacy would be gone on this kind of situation, sponsorship to use a model that is interesting.

Direct technocracy that sounds cool, if such situation happen one could also vote and propose for themselves. But not all are into politics at least this person has a curated model built into his belief and ideals. Rather a human who has its own interest also or who has the biggest backer. Plus being able to correct easily (easily here means could potentially re-train it, but could become an issue also if re-training it would mean involving a lot steps). Then again if one votes directly could mean he would be at disadvantage since he would be interacting with AIs.

That is interesting thanks for this. I'll try address some of your questions let me know what you think?

"what model do we use? Based on what data - since it is inherently biased? How often can we re-roll / regenerate an answer until we like its outcome? Who has oversight over it?"

I imagine a government like this would not still be fully run by AI. Laws proposed would still have human touch perhaps what they would act is almost like an assistant per citizen. They would be briefed on the laws proposed and have the citizen vote for it, or if they give consent have the AI do it. Argue about it in the floor for them.

In the end the president or whoever is at the very top who's human still have the final say if he approves the proposed law.

The model could be based on whatever is available today or the future or a curated model. Though I agree it being bias could be a huge blocker though us humans are also inherently bias maybe that is something we just need to be aware if such thing cannot be removed at all if we have this kind of government.

If the law breaks the constitution for example there will still be the supreme court who are all humans declaring the law invalid.

Rather than have a representative who may or may not be contacted depending how revelant your are to this human representative.

"This is inherently flawed because it means that the existing chat history will sort of lead the future responses, but it's incredibly limited due to context size requiring such vast amounts of vram / ram and processing power."

Won't that be ideal that would mean this LLM inherently knows your choices or belief, aside from the huge increase in processing needed. If the person decide his AI assistant no longer aligns with his view he can then correct it.

Lmao

So basically the person who has the AI representative should have the ability to correct the AI. That would be easier than a human representatives don't you think? But your right corporation would have more power which kinda what is happening already today. In terms of USA that is.

Make sense AI companies would be sure have that much power in this situation.

That could be fix by still having human president perhaps we could limit it to law creations. But I see AI representatives could circumvent the human president.

To be fair, were voting people in the office who basically don't even know what they really doing and are voted in by people who does not know what they want. Even more their own thinking contradicts what this people voted for. With AI you can correct easily but the human representatives is hard to do unless strong reaction from the voting base.

Hacked would be no the same as being bribed? We already trust our systems that is constantly being hacked. What would be the difference to this? Then again still a fair point.

If I were rich good chance I'll be like any typical rich people. Money corrupts.

Not now

We would see a trend of old rich people euthanize.

Final v3

Poor farmers they have to actually get their hands dirty. Poor guy.

The day after tomorrow?

A ticket to visit https://nmaahc.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/slavery-and-freedom

or

https://www.theauschwitztours.com/

A course for https://coursebrowser.dce.harvard.edu/course/slavery-and-historical-memory/

Gift him the yellow badge. Let him wear it and slowly remove his luxury to do things throughout the December.

Disconnection notice from the ISP.

A contract to not use the internet for a year in exchange for X cash/gift.

Fake Klux invitation.

A visit to people with different views including the thing his on, plus if old people for uncool effect.

Do nothing that way you don't get to jail for murder. All the pressure goes to the other guy. Sue the railway company, guy who pulled the lever and the creator. Another is find a way not to reach to that point.