vrighter @ vrighter @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

0

Comments

1,050

Joined

2 yr. ago

but you're still wrong

and again, in the definition you just pasted in there does not say anything about closed form solutions. You keep contradicting yourself in trying to die on that hill

oh really?

i will still have a job unfucking all the ai slop, once the hype dies down

I completely agree with what this comment says. It's still irrelevant though. Where did I say it has to be unbounded? You are countering an argument I did not make. Whether the result is divergent or not is irrelevant. The point is that "not having a closed form solution" is not the meaning of chaos, which was your original wrong statement.

i have oil in the differential that needs occasional replacement

just up our prices. No need to shoot ourselves in the foot. You want a 50% tarriff? I will increase the prices I sell my stuff to you by 50% too. That effectively turns their 50% into 125%. If you do this for stuff they can only get from here then they'll quickly walk it back. Use their tarriffs against them, not do the same thing to our own citizens

what does any of that have to do with anything I said? By the way, that wikepedia page doesn't contain the word "closed" anywhere in it. just saying

No it doesn't mean that. It means that tiny changes in input result in big changes in the output.

By your definition, a simple ellipse is chaotic. Which it clearly isn't. Tiny changes in the axes result in tiny changes to its shape, and by extension its perimeter. Yet there is no closed form formula for the perimiter of an ellipse.

This could also be verified using a simple dictionary, not even a math textbook.

lol if I go to my work pc at 9am and run winget to update all my installed stuff, it'll maybe be done by 11am. Sometimes not. And it's not even compiling anything

I know one person who does this. It's simple: apple discontinued the ipod touch. He had no other choice than to get an iphone without a sim

did you know 95% of statistics are pulled out of someone's ass?

if that's the analogy yoou want, make it 20 kmh

it's a car that only explodes once in a blue moon!

a plane. A flying car is called a plane.

most kids today are technologically illiterate. We didn't call anyone who watched a ton of tv a tech-wiz, because tv was just a device made for consumption of content. Even though the tv uses electricity to work

an ai is not a script. You can know what a script does. neural networks don't work that way. You train them, and hope you picked the right dataset for it to hopefully learn what you want it to learn. You can't test it. You can know that it works sometimes but you also know that it will also not work sometimes and there'sjacksjit you can do about it. A couple of gigabytes of floating point numbers is not decipherable to anyone.

enjoying it is a different issue. You probably enjoy it because it's more difficult, which is perfectly valid reasoning

so? someone invented current llms too. Nothing like them existed before either. If they vibe coded with them they'd still be producing slop.

Coding an llm is very very easy. What's not easy is having all the data, hardware and cash to train it.

i like the analogy