vrighter @ vrighter @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

0

Comments

1,052

Joined

2 yr. ago

what sucks about keepassxc?

Does anyone know of any alternatives? That run on my not google's or amazon's devices?

that's the point. Play something else if that's not your style. It's not pointless.

here's to hoping. I don't use gnome personally, I prefer kde. But I'd rather there be more than one big player all the same.

maybe they should try listening to their users. Maybe that would increase donations

this is so games can render at half the framerate, but the fps counter doesn't show it right? Yay? I guess..

not in the slightest. But the apps are free

no, it wouldn't. Because the car is not filled with aerosolized explodey-gas, but just flammable liquid contained in a robust tank. it is not explosive. It can catch fire, but not simply from impact. You'd need a hole in the tank lower than the current fuel level and an external ignition source. Even if you shoot the gas tank directly, it will not explode. It is physically impossible for it to explode.

Puncture one of an electric car's cells, and it sets off a chain reaction. The whole car very quickly goes up in flames.

extensions are not supported in gnome. gnome devs do not care in the slightest if they break them whenever.

they aren't. The only difference is that the state transition table is so unimaginably gargantuan thit we can only generate an approximation of a tiny slice of it, instead of it being literally a table

a > 30000 vehicle that won't be available for a decade

matrix multiplications. lots and lots of matrix multiplications. What gpus are good at already

the exact same intended use case, in fact

not really. A lot of techniques have been known for decades. What we didn't have back then was insane compute power.

and there's the turing award for computer science.

and physicists use tools from math, so fields medals should be awarded to physicists.

yeah, so that means that it's not incremental improvement on what we have that we need. That will get us nowhere. We need a (as yet unknown) completely different approach. Which is the opposite of incremental improvement.

because, having coded them myself, I am under no illusions as to their capabilities. They are not magic. "just" some matrix multiplications that generate a probability distribution for the next token, which is then randomly sampled.

the first advice the superintelligent ai would give: "power me down"

incremental improvements on a dead end, still gets you to the dead end.

challenge icsiepted! I just need to buy a 3rd monitor