Sorry WVirginians, but you're ass if you like that and you're ass if you, don't because you voted them or you did not even vote. If you voted against those morons, then do something, voice your protest, don't just like some post on the web
I can't have one: there are many, across eras and genres. The first ones coming to mind are Back In The USSR (Beatles), , Kelly watch the stars (Air), The sound of violence (SebastiAn)
And here we go again:
Earlier this month, the A.I.–accelerationist venture capital hub Andreessen Horowitz blessed Quora with a much-needed $75 million investment—but only for the sake of developing its on-site generative-text chatbot, Poe.
I disagree, quora at the beginning was a place to find quick answers to a lot questions on many different themes, a bit like reddit. But it rapidly became full of "pro replier" just like the Microsoft forums and it was unbearable, then, my 2 cents, it was confusing because of subscription, layout, suggested q&a totally unrelated to the topic I was looking for and a lot of questions that nobody would ever even post on /No Stupid Question (I don't want to judge, but for a lot of them it was easier, faster and you'd get an immediate answer with a plain Google search)
Can't compare to Google, but in the few searches I used it, I noticed the most relevant results are quite the same, maybe slightly better with qwant than with ddg, but if your results are a lot, I'd rather go with ddg
You're totally right, my simplified viewer didn't make see the link!
However it really is an estimation based on previous years mad stuff... and while I'd have no problem in accepting a similar math in a less important case, I somehow am not keen to accept them as possibly valid (again, I hope so)
Sorry WVirginians, but you're ass if you like that and you're ass if you, don't because you voted them or you did not even vote. If you voted against those morons, then do something, voice your protest, don't just like some post on the web