Literally no one I work with likes Teams but we keep using it because that's just what we do. Other options basically don't exist simply by virtue of being either not Microsoft or not overwhelmingly the market leader.
The same priority operations can be done in any order without affecting the result, that's why they can be same priority and don't need an explicit order.
6 × 4 ÷ 2 × 3 ÷ 9 evaluates the same regardless of order. Can you provide a counter example?
What really gets me is when someone crosses the line from "enough to hold it together" all the way through "cohesive item you can take bites from" then dives headlong into "everything sloughs off as the cheese stays connected and drags every other topping with it", then acts like nothing is wrong and it's a good thing.
I might be an outlier here, but I absolutely think there is such a thing as too much cheese. My partner and I have regular disagreements about how much should be put on a pizza when we're making one at home.
Spent a moment thinking about this and I think there's an implied definition for what "on earth" means that we intuitively accept but don't ever really need to state.
If your projected free-fall trajectory both forward and backward in time intersects with the surface of the earth then you are "on earth".
Standing on the ground? Intersects twice.
Thrown rock? Intersects twice.
Person in an airplane? Intersects twice.
ISS? No intersection.
Incoming impact meteor? One intersection.
What compression settings are you using for each? If you're just accepting defaults it's quite possible you're comparing against a lossless webp, which is quite likely to be larger than jpeg at typical quality settings.
So what is the mass of a byte of ‘pure’ information? And how do you derive it?
That's all in the linked wikipedia article, but since you asked:
At room temperature, the Landauer limit represents an energy of approximately 0.018 eV (2.9×10−21 J).
That's 1 bit, so 1 byte is eight times that, which you can plug into E=mc2 to get its absurdly small equivalent mass.
It's important(?) to note that Landauer's Principle is not settled science and has yet to be rigorously proven, unless there's some recent development which the comic is referencing. I haven't checked.
No, you missed the point. See @milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee's comment and link to Landauer's Principle, the namesake of which is literally named in the title of the post.
TL;DR: Storing information requires a change in entropy. A change in entropy requires a change in energy. There must be a minimum non-zero amount of energy required for a given quantity of information. Energy is mass due to mass-energy equivalence. ∴ information has mass independent of its physical representation.
I'm not sure why you're taking a oppositional tone. To be clear I'm complaining, not trying to justify it.