venusaur @ venusaur @lemmy.world

Reddit sucks

---

Read more

Posts

13

Comments

1,389

Joined

1 yr. ago

Just seeing if you feel the same across the board. You support the innocence of Luigi and ICE agents until proven guilty. All ICE agents are innocent right now regardless of what they are seen doing.

Fair but they seem to still be influential to people of today. Lots of Luigi fans.

Unfortunately this type of logical fallacy is used across the political spectrum. It’s an easy defense that makes people feel justified without having to do any critical thinking.

You don’t like something about my beliefs? You’re a bigot.

Like the ICE agents?

What do you think it would take to be a revolutionary in the US today and is anybody on their way there?

Not criticizing, but do you actually believe Luigi is innocent? Meaning he didn’t kill somebody or something else?

Wow that’s a new take. Nanny state is definitely a liberal term for not wanting to be tracked by the government. Porn restrictions requiring identification. Police having cameras to track you. That’s all stuff the right want.

The new Che Guevara shirt. Hitting a Hot Topic near you.

I feel like the only defense is to edge towards a nanny state (live stream everything, gps trackers). There’s no good alternative if the law won’t help. Or you gotta break the law yourself.

Are you okay? What’s really bothering you? It’s not about the ruling. I can tell it’s something else. I’m being genuine. You can DM me.

Great chat! Read the ruling:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf

So you don’t have an answer to my question? Sounds like you’re the one operating blindly. Just saying things.

I asked you first. So annoying.

Here ya go: The ruling is against universal injunctions. Any existing injunctions stay and any future plaintiffs can block the order as well. It just can’t be stopped across the country from any existing or future rulings. Unless of course the Supreme Court ends up saying it’s unconstitutional.

Your turn.

Yup. That’s how it is currently. Doesn’t have to be state by state either. Even more granular. Individuals who file suit and win can be immune to it, but other in the same state who have not filed suit could be vulnerable to it. The Supreme Court has yet to make a ruling on whether the order is unconstitutional or not.

Please explain how they removed the ability to challenge it.

Also, they are still going to make a decision. Just haven’t done it yet.

I’d support this. Build an AI tool that’ll take care of it for you.

That’s not true either. The people who filed suit can stop him, but not for the entire nation.

I hope nobody tries to assassinate him. Seems like there’s A LOT of money involved in this race.

This title isn’t true. The court has not “given the OK”

That’s not literally what happened at all. Trump said, “I want to violate the constitution and issued an order”. Then states cities and organizations sued across three cases and courts issued universal injunctions. Trump said “wah! Help me puppet kourt!” Then the Supreme Court was like, “be still mein führer. We will not allow these injunctions to apply to the entire nation. Only to those who have sued.”

They gave him second base. Let’s see if they go all the way for Don Don.