Skip Navigation

Posts
13
Comments
1,420
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • That’s a good compromise, but the dogs all have to undergo surgery. The breed needs to go somehow.

  • Violence isn’t the only problem though. The way women are treated is not realistic or healthy in much of porn. It creates unhealthy expectations. Kudos if you’re watching exclusively healthy sexual relationships in porn.

  • I totally agree. Everybody is misinterpreting what I’m saying into being an advocate for the ways they’re implementing the restrictions. They need a punching bag. I get it. I’ll be it.

    But some people here don’t want to admit porn addiction exists. That’s a sign that it is a problem.

    The problem isn’t just addiction though. The access to and normalization of violent porn to adults and especially children is damaging to society. Maybe people don’t care because it mostly effects women negatively.

  • Yeah, you can’t easily print an entire gun, but the parts you buy don’t necessarily tie you to the gun.

  • Yeah but they have video of him too. Idk the case well enough but I assume the gun itself wasn’t enough to prove he did it.

  • I understand and agree with what you’re saying. I think people should need licenses to have kids, but that’s a different story.

    The conflict that this often boils down to is that the digital world does not emulate the real world. If you want to buy porn in the real world, you need ID, but online anything goes. I love my online anonymity just as much as everybody else, but we’ll eventually need to find some hybrid approach.

    We already scan our faces on our phones all the time, or scan our finger on our computer. How about when you want to access a porn site you have to type in a password or do some biometric credential?

    I think 50% or more of the resistance of restricting porn is really just that people really love porn and are ashamed of what they view. There’s a whole other social psychology that needs to change in regards to how we view sex and I agree with more education.

  • Come on man. You can look up what addiction means. This is proving why there need to be stronger restrictions. If you can’t look up a definition parents can’t work parental controls.

    Here’s part of what makes something addiction:

    Continued involvement despite physical, psychological, social, or legal problems.

    Porn could easily fall into this not only rolled into sex addiction but think about somebody who is jerking it all the time and this has an affect on their relationship, or they’re watching violent porn and this affects how they treat women, or they see the infantilization or submission of women in porn and think women should be like children or that they’re entitled to women’s bodies.

    I get it. Yall love porn, but we also need to be responsible and not be in denial.

    The Rubik’s cube example is an easy question for neurotypical people when you take the above criteria into account. It can be addiction of solving this Rubik’s cube is affecting their life in a negative way. Have you ever seen My Strange Addiction? Lots of different addictions other than drugs and alcohol.

    The inclusions of mental conditions is a whole different story. Autistic or OCD compulsions would generally not be addiction because it’s an anxious thing instead of tied to dopamine reward. It is an interesting intersection, but not what we base laws that control society on.

  • You’re talking about a few separate things here.

    1. I never said this is how it should be implemented. I just said stricter guardrails on porn would do some good.
    2. evidence is needed when creating laws. Yes
    3. when a law is already in effect, breaking the law does not require evidence to prove the law should exist. It requires evidence that the law was broken.
  • It goes both ways. People are gonna find whatever study supports whatever they want to believe and just cling to that. Denying porn and, even sex addiction for that matter, doesn’t exist is denying the basis of addiction and the human brain. Dopamine.

  • Fair, but it still fuels the market. Somebody rescues one. Somebody else sees it and wants one but can’t find a rescue or doesn’t want a rescue, and goes to a breeder.

  • I’m just saying there’s something good in restriction, not the way in which it’s being implemented. I think games like GTA are bad too. There’s also plenty of violence in porn. Towards the women so maybe you don’t perceive that unless it was towards men.

    Parental controls are only effective if all parents control. Should alcohol and guns have no restrictions and be up to parents to control? Exactly.

  • Haha you’ll know you’re old when people don’t get the reference

  • Haha it’s better than that now. You have to see them eating.

  • Am I the only one that thinks there’s something positive to stricter control of pornography?

    Even if you love porn and grew up exposed to it as a kid, you gotta admit that there are psychological effects on avid adult viewers and more on minors.

    Think about what was available as a kid, too. Wait 10 min for a 3 minute to load or just search pics. Now it’s a completely different overstimulating world that transforming how people relate to sex and themselves.