venusaur @ venusaur @lemmy.world

Reddit sucks

---

Read more

Posts

13

Comments

1,420

Joined

1 yr. ago

Because it’s cost prohibitive?

What usually happens if parents are deported? They stay in the US with somebody else?

This article says that authorities claim the mother wanted to take their child with them. Who knows if that’s true, but could mean the post has an inflammatory headline.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/25/us-citizen-deportation-donald-trump-00311631

Anybody who thought their privacy was ever secure on social media platforms is incredibly naive

China also owns billions in US bonds. Japan owns trillions. They could crush us.

👏🏽🙌🏽🖕🏽

Are you on LinkedIn? You should be if you’re not and make your profile strong. Add all of the key terms that a recruiter would be looking for for roles you’re targeting.

Reach out to recruiters directly and message them about any opportunities they are aware of. Some may be contract but may lead to a perm gig.

Good luck!

But they have to be rich, right? I’m interested in the criteria.

What about a nation that supports a company who produces goods that allow the company to make profit, and the production of the goods harms people’s lives (e.g. pollution or poor working conditions in the production country). Somebody should police that nation. Maybe bomb the nation?

Lying about emissions is violence? Like chemical warfare?

I’m so glad the majority of Lemmy is no longer Democrat gimps

Damn, assassination for air pollution is new for me.

Inflammatory title for stupid people

First off, if you’re looking for major changes you need to make this a lifestyle change, or you won’t last long enough.

The good news is that you found diet easy so far. That’s the biggest part. A few weeks is not long enough to get rid of a pot belly. Depending how much of a belly you got, probably looking at closer to 6 months for a really visible change. By 3 months you’ll probably notice a difference but might not be where you want to be yet.

Just stick with it, but try not to focus on it.

If you’re a man I would propose the notion that you only have the perspective of the part of society that is predominantly watching porn and who is predominantly sexual abusers. Your perspective is limited and it’s evident by arguments you make. For example, limiting the support for your opinions to light or moderate porn viewing and that the porn doesn’t include non-consenting individuals or underage, etc. you’re completely ignoring the problem areas the maintain your point of view. Try thinking outside your bubble just as an exercise. Don’t mean this in an offensive way. I can understand your perspective and as such the narrow-sightedness of it.

I’m convinced this was written by GPT. We disagree on how good or bad porn is for society and the youth, so the rest doesn’t even matter.

Dog breeds go through trends just like anybody else. Your fav valuable has a pug? You might want a pug. Maybe not you, but that’s how trends work. The aristocracy tells you what to like. That’s the whole reason they exist in the first place.

You show your ID and a notary enters their credentials to allow you to create an account with your fingerprint or FaceID.

Your ID doesn’t get saved. Your biometrics are only saved in the way that your iPhone saves them for a password.

Work with me. What’s a solution that would be acceptable for you? Get creative.

Plenty of good, non-AI technologies out there that businesses are just slow or just don’t have the budget to adopt.

Porn addiction is real. If you can’t accept that then therein lies the problem.

Do it like this: you have to go to a notary and show your ID and they don’t scan it or anything, but they then authorize you to create an account with biometric credentials. Now only you can use that account to watch porn online. Hybrid approach.

I understand your point of view. These conservative law-makers are hiding their true intentions, but you’re only allowing yourself to think about porn restriction in the lens of current day right-wing politicians. The intent to put more restrictions on porn is not a one way street.

Your analogy to banning artistic freedom is like saying putting restrictions on alcohol is a slippery slope that’s going to eventually have you explaining to a soldier why you have kombucha.

There are so many variations of porn. Some porn is dangerous to be consumed by children and even adults, especially when consumed compulsively through addiction. Maybe not dangerous to straight cis men, but dangerous to almost the entire half of society. I believe that is why it’s so hard to put any restrictions on porn. Straight cis men are clutching onto their undiagnosed porn addictions as hard as they can and using right wing laws to make hasty generalizations about porn restriction leading to the Islamic Revolution.

Also, congrats. Happy safe and healthy jerking.