Pfff the only thing achieved so far is speaking that he's guilty. Of (of all things) not disclosing payment for sex. No prison, no drop from the ballot, so far nothing that's actually useful.
I think that the best immediate thing that will come from this will be Trump rule 34 fanart. Or, who knows, I might be mistaken already...
All that sounds cute, but is still no excuse to simply vote Biden. If the choices in the ballot are "get killed" or "get raped", the answer is not to welcome the rapist, but to vote third party (or blank/null) and to go sharpen your guillotines. Trump already demonstrated that he doesn't respect democratic electoral statements anyway, and a 2-party system is rotten and ill-designed to the core, if he's expected to win then playing fair and square in the hopes that you "only" get raped is self-defeating. Even if Biden wins, the RNC and the KKKronies are still going to (and are already doing so, see RvW) wipe their asses on democracy and condemn the US to accelerando the slow death.
Dragon. I think at that point any message I give him is going to be heard so I'm gonna take my sweet time and once I get a bit more bored I'm gonna fly over the WH roaring "hey Joe, it's genocide!".
but "muh terrorism" is such a wildcard that it can be (and is) used to excuse anything, so that's pretty much the same as saying that Proton does not offer any guarantee at all.
They could host themselves in a different place with better privacy laws. I've always wondered why, for example, don't privacy services establish themselves in international waters or in micronations such as Sealand.
Complete tangent but what is two-party consent even for? I can imagine it gets in the way of getting a lot of evidence in cases of domestic abuse or organized crime.
Caller: [threatens me for 45 seconds]
Me: "Could you call me again and repeat all that, for the recording?"
Caller: [hangs]
, you should take a helicopter view and see that a punch, will lead to counter punches, which will lead to potentially full blown civil war.
You got that wrong. Nazis are already being violent; punching a nazi is not starting violence, it's a defensive measure, it's a response to violence. But sure if your response to violence is "let's sit with the nazis and make a nazi bar" then sure, you do you.
But once they are made aware, the legal system considers them to now bear responsibility if they don’t take action.
And the action Signal can take is pretty clear: "Okay thanks for reporting, feel free to file a lawsuit against Alice and or Bob instead, have a nice day." Remember: even if Signal had Charlie's credentials to view the chat, unless Charlie is an admin of the chat Signal can't do anything other than log Charlie off the group. Plus each participant still has their own message store. So by this point Signal has complied with the law. It's literally Section 230.
Venia Silente @ veniasilente @lemm.ee Posts 4Comments 616Joined 2 yr. ago
Pfff the only thing achieved so far is speaking that he's guilty. Of (of all things) not disclosing payment for sex. No prison, no drop from the ballot, so far nothing that's actually useful.
I think that the best immediate thing that will come from this will be Trump rule 34 fanart. Or, who knows, I might be mistaken already...