This specific source doesn't highlight it and I don't have the opportunity to find something else at the moment, but when I first heard about it ( in a ted talk that I can't remember the name of... ) they had highlighted that health complications followed similar curves. The worsts of course being burning stuff due to dumping it in the air, but that most renewables had their lot of injuries too, that their just less publicized.
Here's my full take of nuclear/renewables
My understanding is that most power grid depending on renewables need an alternate energy source for when power demands ramp up: they need some energy sources that they can tune depending of needs, at the drop of a hat.
Hydro does that, you can let more or less water through. (I happen to live aomewhere where most of our energy is Hydro)
Things like wind or solar are more complicated.
As an energy appoint source, I think nuclear is a good fit for some use cases.
One thing I find annoying is that there's no way for me to let the company know that this behavior lost me as their customer forever unless they change their tune.
I'm fairly sure I'm the kind of person they'd market those products towards and it hurs them, but there's no wat that I'm aware of to let them know.
If there was a way, and a significant amount of people would do so, maybe the decision makers would understand it's stupid...
I think you are right about the lack of diversity.
My own take on it is that lemmy is currently populated by early adopters.
There might be a relation between beign open to try new things and being left-leaning, I don't know.
But I do think that over time, if Lemmy survives it's early day phase, more people joining should bring more doverse point of views.
As others have mentionned downloading the .deb and running it will also work, but I feel nobody gave your a tldr of why you may want to follow those instructions instead, so here it is:
Those instructions configure your package manager (apt) with a new repository for this application.
The upside to that is that anytime you will look for updates, this app will also get updated.
It's a bit more work up front, but it can pay off when you have dozens of app updating as part of normal system operations.
Imagine a world where windows updates would also update all your software, that's what this is.
I know what you're saying, but sometimes it is just the vocabulary.
I remember a conversation with an older woman remembering fondly going dancing with her gay friends.
The words she were using would be considered slurs today (even if a bit dated) but they were not meant maliciously.
It's easy to assume bad intentions, but it does happen that it's just someone that's not informed of the current "correct" vocabulary, and that's okay as long as it's addressed.
I believe that the existence of ad blockers do change the situation quite a lot.
I also pay for youtube premium. Before doing so I was using an adblocker and didn't see a single ad before subscribing.
The reason I did so was that multiple creators I was following mentioning that a view from a premium subscriber was worth more to them financially than from a regular one.
It's the easiest way for me to support multiple creators at once.
The moment my experience decreases, Youtube looses my support and I go Patreon instead. As ublock exists I don't have to live through ads at all.
My grandfather was the cook most of the time, and he was always trying new recipies he found online: in years, I don't think I ever saw him cook the same meal twice.
Everytime he'd taste something new, he'd enthusiastically comment "it's different than usual!" (Rough translation from French "ça fait changment!")
To this day, I have no idea how good or how bad he thought any of those dishes were.
In this specific event, adjusting for inflation on older movies might show that there was precedent where a movie directed by a single woman was more successful than this one.
If that happen, that achievement should also be celebrated.
If that didn't happen, this movie should be even more celebrated.
Asking for more data isn't the same thing as attacking a claim.
Maybe I'm just naive, but I like to assume good intentions.
If someone actually say something sexist, calling them out is important. But I don't think assuming sexism first is a good thing either.
But funily enough, it's probably one of the rare times I'd have answered "yes"!
We got a policy here where anything mislabelled under 10$ is free for the first item.
Anything over 10$ gets a 10$ rebate.
My understanding is that it was put in place a while ago when stores stopped labelling individual items to keep them in check and ensure that consumers had a recourse in case of mistake.
Those are very good points.
This specific source doesn't highlight it and I don't have the opportunity to find something else at the moment, but when I first heard about it ( in a ted talk that I can't remember the name of... ) they had highlighted that health complications followed similar curves. The worsts of course being burning stuff due to dumping it in the air, but that most renewables had their lot of injuries too, that their just less publicized.
Here's my full take of nuclear/renewables
My understanding is that most power grid depending on renewables need an alternate energy source for when power demands ramp up: they need some energy sources that they can tune depending of needs, at the drop of a hat.
Hydro does that, you can let more or less water through. (I happen to live aomewhere where most of our energy is Hydro) Things like wind or solar are more complicated.
As an energy appoint source, I think nuclear is a good fit for some use cases.