Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)VA
Posts
14
Comments
246
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • OP wants FOSS BeReal, it's all there in the title. There is no rule against having a body to the post. I agree that I would be disappointed if showerthoughts was only people's product ideas.

    If this type of post became commonplace we could make a rule trying to avoid spam. How would you word the rule? "No promotion of products or product concepts" that might work. Rules have side effects so I would want to look back through old posts to see if it would hurt quality posts.

    This post did get two reports. Reports are not super down votes, things need to break rules for me to pull them, I try to be objective. As always I'm open to discussion.

    I did giggle about commenter below that is sometimes old. Silver linings.

  • Huh, works fine for me for nearly a year now. The only thing I still use google calendar for are some shared calendars.

    After proton adds Standard Notes. I'm hoping google maps will be the last product I'm tied to.

  • This is my first time being a mod. For example early on I would just remove any post that got a single report, but obviously that's not a good strategy.

    There are also other mods including an automod.

    If I'm reading your picture correctly it was only 6 days ago that your post got removed. I'm not even sure if I can undo a mod action but I'll look into it. Thanks for bringing it up.

    Edit: I am having trouble finding the original context of the comment that got removed, finding out how to reverse it, or finding who removed it. It's possible it was me but I don't remember it. I have reached out to other mods for help.

  • This post received one report pointing out that this post violates the rules 1 & 2; not being a shower thought and the entire shower thought not being in the title. The reporter is correct, at the same time I tend to error on the side of letting posters play with the showerthoughts format and letting the votes do the talking.

    Happy to take feedback if you think my approach is bad.

  • This article has some interesting info for normal people trying to get their bail reduced.

    • The court isn't allowed to force you to go to jail by setting the bail so high that you can't afford it.
    • The court is required to give a reason for the bail amount, but it's not clear if the reason would be public information.