vala @ vala @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

412

Joined

1 yr. ago

Rick and Morty com. No explanation needed.

Ok but these hashtags still are not relevant to the post at all.

Ohh I also misunderstood the question.

The term for what your talking about is "convergent evolution".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_evolution

Also define "evolve" in a way that can be quantized like this.

Biblically accurate angels have entered the chat

Yesterday I asked an LLM "how much energy is stored in a grand piano?" It responded with saying there is no energy stored in a grad piano because it doesn't have a battery.

Any reasoning human would have understood that question to be referring to the tension in the strings.

Another example is asking "does lime cause kidney stones?". It didn't assume I mean lime the mineral and went with lime the citrus fruit instead.

Once again a reasoning human would assume the question is about the mineral.

Ask these questions again in a slightly different way and you might get a correct answer, but it won't be because the LLM was thinking.

No shit

Just fucking do it. Put us out of our misery.

Can California please just withhold taxes already and put this country out of its misery?

Idk man the Godzilla watch in the other comment got hands.

Allowing fdroid from to come from the play store is NOT a solution by any means. Users should have the right to never touch the play store or agree to googles TOS.

I recently started carrying a GPD microPC because of this bullshit.

It's like a very bulky phone. Pocketable but kinda chonk. Thumb typing kinda thing.

But it runs Fedora + gnome with no problems.

My phone is now just for quick stuff and a way to make a WiFi hotspot.

K bye

I understand the "lesson" he's teaching them and also understand that open book tests should be harder.

Point is that he's tricking them. Or letting them trick themselves. That's not what a friend or trusted adult would do. That's what an adversary would do.

He has power over these kids in a big way and should be honest and up front about the reality of the situation.

Sounds kinda adversarial from the teachers perspective.

I confirm that I will see zero ads.

I am so far from trusting and LLM to do mass refactoring even with heavy review. Refactoring bugs can be super insidious.

Not the best choice of words when you are being accused of rigging an election.

Frankly depends a lot on the person.

"This is not possible because..."

This kid is never going to trust teachers again.

He was right. The question is not even worded ambiguously. It was just written very poorly.

Will the teacher admit that? Or is the expectation that this (likely neuro divergent) student should have just understood the expectations based on context clues or something?