usernamesaredifficul [he/him] @ usernamesaredifficul @hexbear.net

Posts

0

Comments

407

Joined

3 yr. ago

well they weren't forcing people to do that and if they were it would be weird

one of the great baffling issues of the later soviet union was how little people appreciated things like safety nets, housing, security in old age. And how much people would really like the new phone

what's next sikhs can't wear turbans in school

I never understood the depth of feeling over this.

In the west there are laws about public indecency which legislate what people may wear outside and these rules demand women wear shirts but do not demand the same of men. We therefore categorically do not culturally believe in the absolute freedom of a person to wear what they will and in fact are arguing a position of where the line is on acceptable dress

secular means not taking a religious stance and being neutral about it. Being secular would mean letting people wear them as they choose not allowing people to wear religious attire is taking a religious stance and thus isn't secular

rather than secularity this is religious persecution

Locals should respect girls with abayas and let them wear them

this one obviously

you can't just introduce a gun in the first act and not expect the players to shoot it in random directions

Yes we are talking about Ukraine right now which is why Ukraine is coming up a lot

as I understand their point they were saying that as Ukrainian nationalists tried to kill their family they are not especially sympathetic to the cause of Ukrainian nationalism. I may be wrong of course but that is what I interpreted their statement as meaning

yes it is an opinionated source but it is also an opinionated source with scientific evidence to back up its claims. What you are doing is seeking false balance between the position that has been reached trhough scientific peer reviewed study and the position "nuh uh"

their relatives were Jews killed in WW2 by the Nazis and Ukrainian collaborateurs like Bandera. That's abundantly clear from context

Secondly. Ukraine themselves asked for these weapons, so they have most likely gone over the risks of using depleted uranium ammunition and have deemed their usefulness to outweigh the potential health down sides that comes from using depleted uranium

yes because the ukrainian government couldn't give a shit about the welfare of the people being poisoned

otherwise it’ll completely legitimise nations to start wars to take land for themselves

no one tell this guy what a nation is it'll break his heart

frankly I found their performance repetative

That's like not listening to doctors about whether or not you should quit smoking because doctors are biased

you know when we met I was on the fence about anarcho-natoism but your warm wit and gentle compassion over the course of our acquaintance has really brought me around. Thank you

tankie is when you think it is bad to knowingly poison children

Well that's Calvinists for you. I don't know why anyone ever listened to that guy but I sure wish they would stop

"the earth was always meant to be temporary" is one I heard. Which for one thing rests on some heavy assumptions but also it is murder according the Jesus to be ok with your actions killing some farmer in Angola

yeah but if they actually read the Bible they would probably notice that they are exactly the same people as the pharisees

well it wasn't the holocaust or anything