I apologize for offending you, but your earlier comment seemed to imply that a child should reasonably share a parents responsibility of their children.
The problem is that a child is the responsibility of the parents, and the parents alone. Could you have said no if you wanted to? You should have been able to, every time.
Previous work got USB sent to them via post and they had to access the data on this drives. These drives came from end customers, so they had two computers specifically for the purpose of retrieving images from the USB sticks and burning them on CDs.
It's tiring to see everyone taking sides. Just admit that both sides are wrong: Hamas are using civilians as cover, Israel is just killing everyone to get at Hamas. The people suffer. :-(
The only arguments against I have seen so for is systemd does a lot more than just handing system startup (systemd-resolved is one such example) and files that was previously stored as text now require systemd's own tool to read (journalctl?).
So not the actual startup function, just everything else.
I'm guessing that it is just people who really want kids but cannot conceive on their own. Some people can get really desperate went it comes to having this, combine that with an apparent lack for moral standards, and this happens.
I apologize for offending you, but your earlier comment seemed to imply that a child should reasonably share a parents responsibility of their children.