Unmarketable Plushie @ unmarketableplushie @pawb.social

[she/they/it]

---

Read more

Posts

42

Comments

203

Joined

2 yr. ago

You're making a false equivalence there, comparing a drug to a human being with thoughts and feelings. If you change your sentence to "I would abuse my partner if I had one", one involving an actual human being, people would be telling you to get therapy even if you remained single, because it's unhealthy way to think about human beings.

Well, I apologise for misconstruing you then.

Believe it or not, but it IS transphobic to deliberately keep triggering someone's dysphoria like that.

That's so obviously not what the problem is here, you're just misdirecting.

The problem people are having is their weird fixation on the breasts of trans men, and their own admission they'd be a nonstop creep about it.

Are you thick? I'm saying that thinking that's an acceptable thing to say about someone's body in that context, regardless of whether you're daring them or not, is actually fucked in the head.

Also, that's an absolute classic opening to your argument: "I'm an ally, but ... Wait! Wait! I have trans friends so that automatically makes me correct about any transgender issues whatsoever!" Never heard that before. /s

HRT lootbox

I know this is going to be an unpopular opinion, but that comment is actually pretty fucking gross. If the hypothetical trans guy is fine with his boobs, no problem. But the insinuation that OOP would keep "complimenting" someone on a part of their body that makes them dysphoric is just sickening.

I'm a trans girl. I really don't like having a flat chest, it makes me dysphoric. Yes, there are girls with flat chests, both cis and trans, that are fine with that, and yes, I do find girls with flat chests attractive too. But if someone went up to me and kept telling me my flat chest was hot, despite knowing that it made me, uncomfortable, I'd fucking deck them.

Oh fuck off. This is just victim blaming.

Weirdo libertarians like you don't understand how the world works at all, so I'm not surprised.

What do you even think taxes are for? What services do you think they even provide for you?

I guess we should take away healthcare, since that only affects individuals. Sick people should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps!

Why does my doctor charge for a doctor's note?

You think people should PAY for healthcare? LMFAO

Why does it literally cost over $100 to change two lines on a piece of paper? Literally, why put such a ridiculously inflated price on a government service?

There was no response, he spontaneously combusted upon seeing it like it was the face of God

Freddy faz bore

Interesting concept! I can't comment too much on the balance, but I still have come criticisms.

• Charisma doesn't make a whole lot of sense for a saving throw proficiency. I would probably replace it with Intelligence.
• The weapon proficiencies are also a bit odd. The player starts with melee weapons, gets access to fighting styles that benefit their usage, but isn't proficient in them? They should at least get proficiency with all simple weapons maybe a list like: "simple weapons, blowgun, hand crossbow, heavy crossbow, longbow" would be good.
• No abilities at second level? I guess that might be because that's when the ranger gets spells and you removed that. It's super disappointing to level up, especially after the first level-up of the game, and get literally no new abilities. Out of all the base classes in the game, only spellcasters get "dead levels" (levels without any features), and that's because they get access to the next spell level on those levels (exception: the warlock's level 18 is dead, but to be fair that's after they can cast 9th level spells, plus they at least get a new Invocation). Maybe give them Action Surge or something?
• The whole class feels very loaded towards the subclasses doing things while the "chassis" of the class doesn't do a whole lot. I'm not sure if that's a bad thing or not, but that definitely stuck out to me.
• I feel like it would make more sense for the Spellshot to be a ⅓-caster (like eldritch knight or arcane trickster instead of getting spells up to 7th level. That's how other subclass casters do it. Subclass casters also usually get their own spell lists.
• Magic Arrows is super confusing, relies too much on randomness, and doesn't scale well.
• I know I'm being mostly negative here, but I really love the concept behind the Jagged Arrow archer. It's a very flavourful concept and I feel like we need more subclasses like that.

Same with Thunder

Spaghettification

Rare AI W

Liftoff would randomly become horribly glitchy for me and could only be fixed temporarily by uninstalling and reinstalling. It's really promising but it needs some work.