Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)UN
Posts
0
Comments
282
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Affordable? Are you in the market for a new Ford vehicle? What does your budget look like?

    If you're in the US you can get into a

    for like ~$20k after the federal tax incentive, plus any state incentives that would apply in your situation.

    If you're talking about Ford specifically, they're not going after the budget market because they're trying to play to their strengths - the F150 and Mustang. Neither of those brands are typically associated with being cost conscious, but the F150 has been the best selling vehicle in the country for

    . The F150 Lightning is priced comparably to the gas powered option for similar features, and the Mach-E is right in line with the Mustang GT, which makes sense because let's be honest, nobody buys an ecoboost Mustang expecting to enjoy it.

  • I read through both of my responses again, since I couldn't recall suggesting that the best option would be to turn the other cheek, and it turns out that I remembered correctly and actually didn't say that. 🤔

    To clarify, I haven't been suggesting that I've found a solution to this problem, merely that I think that the way in which we are currently trying to solve the problem is not a solution.

    If I need to solve x + 1 = 2, I can consider infinite solutions that are incorrect without needing to solve for the correct answer; 0 doesn't work, 2 doesn't work, etc. I can do this without having the answer to the original problem.

    In this instance, we've been trying to solve this problem with violence and cruelty for quite some time now, and I'm simply of the mind that if it was going to work it would have done so by now.

  • It doesn't take a military strategist to know that this wasn't the right response. Terrorism is an ideological threat, it cannot be defeated or "rooted out" by conventional weapons until you kill every last person who finds it worthwhile to fight for the ideology. Out of all of the diverse peoples of the world, you might expect that the Jews would understand the gruesome impracticality of that goal.

  • Not OP but my read on this is that OP is suggesting that Israel or the US should have a recording of the rocket being fired that would have been captured by a satellite and could be shared.

    Obviously there are images that have been published showing the destruction, but it's not clear to me how looking at a picture of rubble would help to establish the origin of the rocket fire.

    Given how many bombs have been dropped in Gaza (

    ), it's easy for me to imagine that the destruction of this Palestinian hospital was due to an errant Israeli bomb, but pretty difficult to imagine that a Hamas soldier with bad aim accidentally took out one of their only hospitals. From the outside, it feels like the burden of proof lies with the side that seems to be trying to flatten Gaza, not the side without access to food, water, electricity, or medical supplies.

    Having said that, I sincerely doubt that this will be the last atrocity committed by either side before this is over, so I doubt that we will ever get any evidence that is truly conclusive.

  • I played a lot of Sim City 2000 back in the days when you needed to install games using physical CD media, and I don't remember anything about this particular tech.

    Having said that, this would have been back in the stone age so I may be misremembering 😁

  • Yes, but not quickly enough to meet our power needs for advanced machines like electric vehicles over the long run. That's why the air force is developing this satellite technology. Why shouldn't we all benefit from it, like we did with GPS?

  • Okay now imagine a future where we're able to beam power down from space, which is

    .

    I know it's probably not viable for a million reasons but how cool would it be if this tech truly is viable and the air force is able to develop it to a point where they can start offering it to the public, to support infrastructure, such as in-transit charging, or even just to support rural applications like farming? Would probably help with climate change at least.

  • I'd argue that Amsterdam isn't a great example, as the infrastructure of that city was largely built before the advent of automobiles, then converted to support a more Americanized design that was vehicle-centric, before finally realizing, "Hey, we're Dutch, not American, we need more space for our bicycles!"

    If we're discussing American infrastructure designed in the 20th century, it seems to be pretty difficult to convert because the physical structures of both the transportation infrastructure and the destinations people want to visit are not built densely enough to make going without a car a top tier option for most people.

    I mean this broadly, not to say that there aren't opportunities to start moving this in the other direction, but emphasizing that changing the focus to downplay the importance of vehicles will be neither quick, cheap, or easy.

  • The House is such an interesting part of our Democracy; it's where local issues collide with national interests. While

    isn't a small number of people, it seems like a tough argument to suggest that this small smidgen of Florida represents the will of 'the people'. However, what it ought to do is underscore the importance, nationwide, of participating in the electoral process.

    I think the extent to which that will happen largely depends on how the rest of this process plays out, but for the time being, I'm content to sit back and laugh at the absolute shitshow as it develops.

  • You could argue that, but I wouldn't recommend it.

    Microsoft has a massive amount of resources to throw at securing their environment, whereas most businesses simply don't have the ability to field a dedicated security team. The solution many reach is to offload risk to your software vendor, in this case Microsoft. Then, if there is data lost, it's Microsoft's fault, and it's their problem to fix, too. It's not ideal, but it's the world we're living in.