I just decide that any site doing that doesn't really have anything meaningful to provide and has mostly copy-pasted content from actual resource-providing websites, with added SEO.
So I just close the site most of the time.
So far it has paid off. I tend to find more sites that give information that was actually written by someone knowledgable about the field.
Thinking I should start making my own list, considering search engines are probably never going to make those easier to find.
The basis of me pointing that out is that if you use statistics as the measuring to for success (which seems like the only option, but at the same time is lazeasy) of this, then solution providers will use the easiest solution to it, which hovers around trusting every woman's claim.
Combine that with the social stigma that comes with being accused of(whether or not proven) rape and the mental trauma that comes with being falsely accused of any problematic thing and you see statistics rise for other problems, which weren't significant before.
Post that, you will have countermeasures for those, having to balance between statistics of occurrences one problem vs the other, while the fundamental problem remaining the same:
As long as there is no good enough way to identify the bandit, there will be incentive for people to willingly take the bandit route. And the bandits in general win.
If you feel like you are being attacked by rape victims saying they don’t trust men, you should probably look into why.
I don't go out enough to feel so and my lack of upper body muscles also helps. At the same time,
I am very fine with not being considered safe, since I myself don't consider anyone safe. I stay cautious, no matter whether it is a child I'm passing by or someone walking around with a rifle and seeing someone similarly be cautious towards me is not going to cause negative feelings.
My point is, don't use statistics as a crutch to make people realise the problem, because statistics will eventually breakdown and you don't want peoples' enthusiasm towards fixing the problem, to breakdown along with it.
It's important for people to understand that even if the cases were 1 in 1000, it still is a problem.
but you’re prioritizing your own feelings over their real rapes by diverting this conversation
There's a reason why multiple replies can be given to the same comment on this platform. It's because this way, unlike talking, we can actually have multiple threads of conversations at the same time.
I am not diverting any conversation, just creating another one.
1 in 6 women get raped and you’re gonna let a few people who use social engineering in awful ways excuse that
You are attempting to create a feelings based response using this sentence.
You know what I have to do, before any of the other things mentioned, to take advantage of any such opportunity? ::
Be alert to notice such an opportunity
Somehow convince myself that the outcome of each and every step is desirable
A person who would willingly rape someone, won't have the 2nd barrier. Similarly, a person who would willingly use the social power given to women (specifically to prevent rape), won't have the same, 2nd barrier.
Those who would, won't find find themselves doing so even given the easiest of opportunities.
The above post and the server it is on, is much more open ended and doesn't mandate a certain specific type of violence. You seem to be having a problem with anyone responding to you with any other dimension of, what is essentially, a bandit - victim interaction.
Also, how many of those "1 in 6 women" managed to get away with lying?
I'm not claiming rape to not be a problem (as you might want to state), but statistics are not going to help win against it either. Specially considering how hard it is to determine the truth of it.
Maybe Boeing will learn from their mistakes and go for using their relatives as leverage or tarnishing their reputation by framing them with treason instead.
I think you have part of your answer.
Get a laptop with a SIM Card reader, and do what you may.
The reason it doesn't work with IP is because, it started out with local networks and was expanded from that.
A domain name is similar to a phone number, just that the user has the IP routing information available, whereas in case of phone connection, a probably similar system for routing is all abstracted by cell exchanges.
It's also illegal (in writing) to have a random sticker on a screw of an appliance, stating "Warranty void if removed".
Doesn't stop anyone from using it to escape warrantying user stuff, simply because it is not enforced well enough.
Ah you're right. Rereading it fixed the doubt. Guess I skipped a few words the first time. Mental note to not skip words in a legal document. Or any written document.
On the contrary, it (the website) looks really nice.
The product, on the other hand, seems targeted towards "normies" and would probably do better in a place that doesn't have ppl already self hosting their stuff.
I just decide that any site doing that doesn't really have anything meaningful to provide and has mostly copy-pasted content from actual resource-providing websites, with added SEO.
So I just close the site most of the time.
So far it has paid off. I tend to find more sites that give information that was actually written by someone knowledgable about the field.
Thinking I should start making my own list, considering search engines are probably never going to make those easier to find.