You are talking about either right for name or right of authorship. I don't remember which is which, but in normal countries(aka in Europe) it is inalienable right, unlike copyright, which can be sold.
If you want copyright THAT badly, you should demand making it inalienable instead of protecting status quo of total publisher's control.
EDIT: right for name is to have your name on art, right of authorship is to call yourself author.
EDIT2: copytight outside of capitalism just does not make sense.
You are overexaggerating under assumption that there will exist social and economic system based on greed and death threats, which sounds very unreali-- Right, capitalism.
There is russian phrase "fight of beaver and donkey", which loosely means fight of two shits. Copyright is cancer and capitalist abuse of genAI is cancer.
And it's also stupid from the company's perspective. If someone has the flu and you have them come in - well - everyone will be sick and everyones performance will suffer.
3.2. ensure that any additional charging protocol allows for the full functionality of the USB Power Delivery referred to in point 3.1, irrespective of the charging device used.
USB C is mentioned in annex Ia and as an example in articles 11 and 12. As I understand previous articles, it is possible to use other standards that satisfy citeria from article 9.
Don't worry, this is just special retroactive abortion