uberrice @ uberrice @feddit.de

Posts

0

Comments

90

Joined

2 yr. ago

You can even get 25gbps symmetrical - for the same price. They just charge 333 chf to set up instead of 111 for 10gbps, because the optics are more expensive.

I love their policy. 'providing you with 25gbps or 10gbps or 1gbps costs us the same. So we'll provide the max that we can, as long as you pay for the optics' - all for a single price. No stupid speed tiering. They also have open peering - my ping is phenomenally low to most things.

I get 10gbit/s symmetrical dedicated for 777 chf / year through init7. It's an absolutely terrific option in Switzerland by an absolutely terrific provider.

Same.

Lemmy is not your marketing platform.

Definitely. I assume the actual cost for the cable is <10$, but engineering work gets very expensive very fast if you're small scale.

I'm interested in something - say you got an order for 1 million units, what's the price per unit you could offer?

Edit: just looked at the DIY option - seems right now you're just using off the shelf parts, which is fine. Clever use of them, even. Main part seems to be 'present usb device - once the usb device gets removed, lock down the PC'. So, you specifically just need some usb device with a cord that attaches magnetically - and securely enough that it doesn't disconnect randomly, with some mechanical way to fix it to yourself. So yeah, at million scale, seems you could definitely sell it for 10 bucks a piece.

Meh, the best programmers are probably somewhere in the middle.

This also depends on what kind of work you're doing.

Writing some frontend with lots of Boilerplate? That's lots of lines.

Writing efficient code that for example runs on embedded systems? That's different. My entire master's thesis code project on an embedded system consisted of around 600 lines of C code, and it did exactly what it should, efficiently.

A better metric to that effect would be the git activity graph. People that do important changes don't commit 20 times a day - they push a commit usually once a day tops to once every 2 weeks

December, and it's already been long without one. Next one coming up in September, then again around December, then sometime early next year probably

There's two kinds of rules in my opinion. On one hand you have the rules that are just understood, without having to be talked about. On the other hand you have rules that you just tell everybody, and with that you show people rules that they really should care about. The problem here is, if you explicitly State rules to people, then you partly seem to expect people to break these rules.

If you take a look at sites like 4chan, you can see that even without any rules whatsoever, there still is at least some level of decency with most interactions. Of course there's a lot of Filth and really non-decent Behavior going on on 4chan, but that is not the point.

I myself am a believer in humans generally being decent. I don't mind people being banned for going against the sites 'community code' - and it's good that it's laid out clear. The way that this rubs me the wrong way is that rules that are front and center, shoved in your face, can kind of act like 'gatekeeping'.

The rules for beehaw are actually well-stated, in a way that shows what they want to go for. But for example a standard top level rule on mastodon instances is 'No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, or casteism.'

Sure, the intention behind it is fine. I know where they want to get at. But these words are, currently, all very charged. Does a guy saying 'I do not like having that many foreigners in my neighbourhood' constitute xenophobia? You don't have context - maybe the neighbourhood the person lived in has a lot of people living there that all speak a different language - so the person feels 'left out' of the community. That has nothing to do with the fact that they are foreign people - just with the fact its a foreign language. What about stating criticism on your countries' immigration politics? At what point, exactly, does this go from 'civilised discussion' to 'xenophobia'?

I'm going with xenophobia as the example as I think it's the most easily illustrated here, but this goes for all rules.

I have to say, the first time I read those rules on my mastodon instance, I was put off. The mere presence of that rule kind of indicated to me that this was made for a specific group of people, that I do not really belong to - judging from past experiences. This turned out not to be the case, and I like interacting with people on mastodon.

I would just like to have people assume other people to be decent beings. It is good to have rules written down, to accurately pass judgement on whether something is allowed or not allowed - but shoving them into people's faces when they join might put people off.

Tldr: it's less about having rules, it's about stating rules in a way that they're clear, not open to interpretation, and that the rules are relatively 'clear' of ideology - so that the place the rule applies to is welcoming.

Beehaw is cool. There's good discussions about things.

I am, however, personally opposed to the whole safe space trend. I do not care if some place is a 'safe space', and I'll play by the rules a place has. But some little part in me finds all these 'don't do x, don't be y, don't think of z' rules very off putting. I wasn't planning on doing any of these things, but the fact that these things get pushed to the forefront when you're registering or reading the rules of a place so much - it just rubs me the wrong way.

Your phone can play music just like an mp3 player can.

Your phone doesn't have an e-ink screen.

That's the whole reason.