She has a point though. There should be a minimum amount of reason to be allowed to vote. Some people shouldn't be allowed to vote, because if they do, this is what happens.
Which makes Darwin a system with BSD elements, just like some versions of Windows and all versions of Linux. Windows and Linux aren't BSDs, I think you agree; neither is Darwin, for the same reason.
It depends on what you want to do with it, which version of which component you run and a couple of other things. In my own experience, if you want a "super reliable" system, get OpenBSD. Linux has a severe lack of QA, mainly because of its decoupled nature.
Nothing's wrong with religion. I don't believe that Buddhists automatically make an objectively worse choice than atheists.