Was anything I said incorrect, its literally cited right there.
I just find it rich to complain about affordable housing when Jagmeet did everything in his power to raise home values. But as a lawyer in a Rolex who drives a BMW its about what I'd expect.
Its also not even the extent of it. The Federal government is also deregulating banks to extend amortizations, and buying half of all mortgage bonds to juice full recourse debt for the young. Is any of this sinking in or have you got another ad hominem retort?
1.5 million immigrants in a year isn't a "little too far". The UN called it modern slavery.
Carney also seemingly wants to continue it.
When asked whether Canada can afford a pro-immigration policy, Carney responded, “The short answer is yes we can – and arguably, we can’t afford not to.”
Carney emphasizes integrating the 4+ million newcomers who arrived in recent years, focusing on transitioning temporary residents (TRs) to permanent residents (PRs).
If you want to help the poor then reducing demand is the first step, obviously matching immigration to housing supply would have been smart.
Food bank usage skyrocketing and more people living in rest stops probably does lead to crime.
On account of accepting 1.5 million people a year into an existing housing shortage.
Not the immigrants fault, we did it to prop up asset values. Along with buying 50% of all mortgage bonds federally, extending amortizations, and ignoring developer fees and sprawled zoning.
Tariffs raising the price of goods is all well and good, but interest rates control the money supply. Goods prices can rise however there is only so much cash available to buy things, so we are getting lower corporate margins and a recession, not inflation.
I get about an hour and a half a day of free time, which I should probably be using to clean.
If we had shorter work days it would be far better, though we bid up housing prices using loose monetary policy so that's not happening. Most people aged to procreate are funding boomers poor retirement planning.