They excluded housing appreciation from the CPI in the late 80s, created 30 year loans, massive bailouts adding to moral hazard; I agree its neoliberalism, deregulating the money supply growth made people over leverage to profit off the cantillon effect, obviously leading to asset bubbles.
The money supply now grows at 10% a year. People are okay with huge leverage into real estate because housing always goes up, as their currency always goes down. The farther you were born from the gold standard the poorer you will likely be.
With tablets and software its easier than ever to produce and share art, it doesn't have to be a job any more because its so easy to produce and share. It's not a bad thing, we can create whatever art we want with ease, unlimited abundance. Let's not paint that positive reality like a bad thing.
Is digital art itself bad, because its not the human doing all of it?
Is it ableist to not define AI art as art, when handicapped people can't perform the same actions?
Does it not create an abundance of art, and thus expands the entire field making it evolve well beyond its current state?
Gate keeping art is silly regardless, you can't stop it. Just be happy you could make people pay for it while you could, like coal shovelers and blacksmiths things change.
Its a cybersecurity issue so it is inevitable, browser apps are the future because corporations don't want files sitting on a filesystem, they want to keep them in their enterprise storage. ChromeOS is the future, or something like it.
Agreed. Hence why most people would find it reprehensible.