trustnoone @ trustnoone @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

1

Comments

166

Joined

2 yr. ago

What's a protogen?

For what it's worth, emby does pull YouTube data in for me, as I have a few YouTube video series in my erm media folder and was surprised it automatically brought the metadata. So jellyfin might have something similar built in.

oh I might be able to help you.. with a song about thrift! when you get a penny from a chum, don't just spend it on bubblegum. Put in your cap, put it in your cap

https://youtu.be/icfzrBm-vuU?si=dUz9syGoF_v9vBSL

There is one thing particularly interesting, and that is that the inverse square laws appears again. It appears in the electrical laws for instance.

That is electricity also exerts forces inverse to the square of distance with charges. One thinks perhaps inverse square distance has some deep significance, maybe gravity and electricity are different aspects of the same thing

...

Today our theory of physics, laws of physics are a multitude of different parts and pieces that don't fit together very well. We don't understand the one in terms of the other. We don't have one structure that it's all deduced we have several pieces that don't quite fit yet.

And that's the reason in these lectures instead of telling you what the law of physics is I talk about the things that's common in the various laws because we don't understand the connection between them.

But what's very strange is that there is certain things that's the same in both

Richard Feynman and 45:48 https://youtu.be/-kFOXP026eE?si=hAIvDhWVGxMOvEi1

Wait coffee has more caffeine then energy drinks?

Grimes: you've.. been to out of space? You??

Homer: sureee, you've never been?

https://youtu.be/axHoy0hnQy8?si=tz4P1iC1iJyi51-I

This was just sooo good. Feels bad that Grimes just dealt a bad hand in life.

Aw Garfield would love it.

Everyone's comments here are right but I do feel you OP, I've been wanting to learn Godot and react recently but seeing people just pull code straight from ChatGPT and it's way better then I can code right now, does feel a bit like "should I really try this path".

Tbf I do think you can work hand in hand with ChatGPT where it just makes you faster at development, but I still do feel a little sting. And with so much stuff I want to do, I've re-prioritised other things instead.

Eh I don't think we're obsessed with it, it's more just like the likely outcome due to human nature. Largely pushed by:

• greed
• differences
• And only asking "could we" and not "should we"

Take the day off work. Knowing that I can just be under the bed covers and I don't have to even hear about a work issue.

I wish I could choose size of font, so many games have a font that only works on certain TVs or played in handheld mode.

Also I wish we could all align in settings menu at some point, so I'm not hunting down these weird unexpected settings.

I don't know if I'm crazy but there's always something weird about these. So many of these laws come into Australia and I legit never hear it ANYWHERE besides a random Reddit or Lemmy post, like it's being removed from the news.

And it always seems to have support from both side, so that they go in quietly. These sides will literally argue anything just because they're on a different side, but never with these laws that affect freedoms.

IMO Australia also seems to be the "test" country, as I usually see these laws then try to start in UK and US a couple years later citing "Australia does it".

I used to get acid reflux all the time, like constantly. Then one week I had no sleep and I just couldn't deal anymore.

So I spend the next fortnight eating nothing but non-acidic foods and taking those calcium carbonate tabs things every third day (even if I had no reflux).

And somehow, my chronic reflux is just gone. Never get it anymore unless I drink 2l of orange juice in one sitting. Even then it's only once off and that's it. This is not medical advice, but somehow my years of reflux is gone like that.

You were the first to purchase WinRAR

There's a lot of different views, many with some truths to it. I'll try to give an answer but please take into account my answer is quite bias too.

The question, unlike the title of the article, the actual vote is on

whether the Constitution should be changed to include a recognition of the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice.

The problem is, how exactly or what exactly is an Aboriginal/Torres strait Islander voice. It's not like Australia is voting to not give these groups voting rights like many articles seem to suggest.

It's about what does this voice mean, do they have the power over government, can they stop laws, does it even help, whose even in it?

And there is no answer real answer, most answers I see are "it's about creating a voice" or "we want to see Aus support before putting into action" etc (this may have changed later but that was the initial info I was getting), so you basically asked the Australian people to vote into changing the consitution on a potential something? Which for many feels like a permanent change or an unknown thing.

So all the no side had to do was be like "oh if you don't know, then best to err on the safe side and vote no". "Who knows what this could do". "You can always wait and change it later".

Imo the votes would have been very different if it instead just asked "would you like to see an Aboriginal / Torres strait Islander voice in government" and not touched the constitution. Or if they just made the voice/team/group and showed Aus how helpful it was before asking them to change the consitution.

And (I'm prob showing more bias here) if the yes side didn't just call everyone racist who looked at the no vote (which I believe many are swing voters), it couldve provided enough time/listening to make changes to the argument that would change the voters. For example if they made it clear that it would just be used to support better decision making and help understanding etc. Though I can't be too harsh when many of the no side arguments felt objectively like lies.

A big thing in my country, business buildings are expensive because of location and what's around them. But if employees aren't in the office, restaurants, cafes public transport corner shops etc lower in demand or even close entirely. This makes the building itself less in demand and harder to rent out at a higher price.

A lot of these buildings are owned by banks, CEO's and financial institutions who have the money to push for changes like government to make people come into office and can use any reason like "think of all the failing cafes!".

Makes me wonder whether those with the top dollar gets to influence what we see, and slowly how we think. A couple vids here a few ads there that slowly appeal to things it already knows you like. Until it creates a new norm.

I want to add to this that it's also a self circulating thing too. It's easy to start reading text that's antiwomen, seeing videos about it, slowly further looking into more and more negative things. Some guys literally brain wash themself on this. That's why some media worry me.

For example I recently watched a video that discussed the negatives of Captain Marvel as a movie. Not long after my videos started showing negatives of other shows and movies like velma, shehulk and snow white etc.

Then not long after that all my videos started showing anti women, and more just outright incel videos.

Doing my part to keep our security team at work employed.

Mr McAfee noooo.