China Installed More Solar Panels Last Year Than the U.S. Has in Total
trackcharlie @ trackcharlie @lemmynsfw.com Posts 0Comments 481Joined 2 yr. ago
trackcharlie @ trackcharlie @lemmynsfw.com
Posts
0
Comments
481
Joined
2 yr. ago
Cool.
And how many of them function properly?
Anyone who does this should be blacklisted entirely
You clearly haven't educated yourself on the economic factors at play. The "richest" country in the world is rich in valuation, not monetary wealth.
There's a difference between having a bunch of products (and businesses) that are expensive and of high quality than having a bank full of money. (See fed balance sheet)
If you actually take some time out of your day from being condescending to people that actually educate themselves on these matters and look up the current situation with liquidity (i.e. money) in the banking system, you'll realize that the multiple bank failures in 2023 was a prelude to what's going to be happening in 2024-2025.
This is an issue happening all over the world and people continue to not educate themselves on macroeconomics and then have the audacity to comment on it in the exact same fashion you just did.
This hot take brought to you by someone who clearly hasn't lived or worked in QC over the last decade.
You want a high number of quality employees? Stop reducing the standards and start increasing pay.
Full fucking stop.
I always find it ironic when religious people try to use race as a justification for their bigotry when Jesus was clearly of middle eastern descent.
It infuriates me beyond belief that I was one of the few individuals who actually read through the bible when I was forced to go to catholic school.
That and the absolutely abhorrent state of humanity really designates evidence that these books of all major religions are just the words of man to trick people into believing a god.
Malleable idiots are the easiest to control, after all. The inquisition proved this and every major violent engagement since has just been additional evidence.
Calling anything we have now "AI" is a marketing gimmick.
There is not one piece of software that exists currently that can truly be labelled AI, it's just advertising for the general population that doesn't educate themselves on current computing technology.
Canada had this problem with Quebec until it was made abundantly clear to the morons running the QC separatist movement that they can leave, but they can't take the dollar with them.
Once the people pushing this nonsense realize it will completely cripple their economy, they'll stop being stupid, at least in this particular regard.
Starting a new currency from scratch is exceptionally difficult and I doubt, with the debts that texas has, that it will be even remotely fungible to pay off their owing surplusses and create a functioning economy.
Just because texas doesn't have ridiculous tax laws on the rich doesn't mean that those tax laws will remain the same once papa government comes calling with the enforcers threatening imprisonment or death for not funding them.
Governments require money to run and texas does not currently have the freedom from financial liability to just go 'we're gonna go our own way', regardless how much they pretend.
There's no world in which a part of an internationally recognized country just outs and picks up their trade agreements, business agreements, and government continuity without fulfilling their former financial obligations.
I actually can't believe how unbelievably uneducated these people in power are that they think it's going to be smooth sailing leaving the republic. Even assuming the president and congress ok's it, you need to literally create all the fundamental requirements for a 'country' from scratch again and prove stability before anyone will conduct business with you and, spoiler alert, breaking away from a country with 11 carrier strike groups is the epitome of stupidity and objectively does not show stability.
Also, being part of a democratically elected government means you can't make a decision like this without a vote (See brexit and the hilarious ramifications of that for a near 1:1 example of what happens when you fuck around with this type of decision and the only reason the UK didn't completely collapse immediately is because they didn't actually adopt the euro and the pound has [had] it's own economic power)
"Generate this copyrighted character"
"Look, it showed us a copyrighted character!"
Does everyone that writes for the NYTimes have a learning disability?
Lol, it always comes back to an intellectually deficient group of morons and their baseless deity.
Because we may have separated from the other great apes several million years ago, but the great ape predilection for tribalism sure hasn't separated from us
I'd posit a well rounded education doesn't necessarily agree with that. You don't need a professional education in a topic to be able to provide a decent opinion, it's just that many people opt not to work on their own educations and prefer to be spoon fed materials, and it's this behaviour that produces morons in almost every context, rather than individuals that have problematic views in a few topics.
taking pro se forces the company to provide evidence and pay for lawyers while you just wait for their case to build, if they don't have a case, then there's no problem, if it gets to trial they have to prove damages, since there aren't any, that will be difficult to prove.
Taking pro se is not recommended in most situations but in this one, where the damages are entirely made up, taking pro se would not be overly tumultuous
Some people on lemmy are smart, likely a higher ratio than many other sites, but there's still a ridiculous surplus of fools
I'll never pay for another capcom game but you can be damn sure that doesn't mean I'll never play another capcom game.
Good work you old dipshits, shooting your long time fanbase instead of doing literally anything else
Sorry, you saw the literal sources I provided to the wall street warlords that trudeau is selling canada to and your response is "it's pierres fault"/"you're a conspiracy theorist"?
Do you have a reading comprehension problem or did you just opt to not click through a single source before you made your comment?
Pierre wasn't even a name on the CPC ticket during the wetsueten attacks by the RCMP and last I checked it was trudeau's choice to do black face all 5 times and to dress as a nazi all 3 times he did it.
If you don't want to vote then don't vote, but you definitely don't reserve the right to call anyone a conspiracy theorist when you can't even be bothered to look at the information provided to you by a wide variety of journalists, first nations and wall street firms that directly corroborate what I've said.
Not only did the video linked have an easy run down with video footage of the wetsueten attacks and various deleterious impacts of the oil industry, it included all sources in the description specifically to combat sleazy arguments like the one you're presenting.
I agree with you there and would go a step further to note that public discourse on anonymous forums is extremely helpful for people to add context and philosophy to the understanding of the third option.
Many people here that are taking to discussing this are the outliers, just by being aware of it, and by being aware of it we can understand its potential use for good or ill and can contextualize the discussion in that frame of reference long before any of us are called to be on a jury, my concern would be those that do not take to discussing law, politics, and philosophy prior to being called to a jury being made aware of the third option with little time to reflect on its implications.
I think some people will browse the discussion and not truly reflect on the contents until possibly months later, while others that are directly engaging in the discussion will reflect currently and posit their views now while also being willing to amend those views should a more appropriate philosophy or fact be made available during the discussion.
Because different people will reflect at different rates this can have a deleterious effect on a trial if one learns of the third option too soon with little ability to reflect on the meaning and implication of a, usually unprofessional (law-career wise, not necessarily in manners), panel of jurors' choices.
It's always important for the jurors to respect the evidence before their own bias and sometimes people don't have the ability to disconnect their emotions from the logic present to be able to do that, but discussions on public forums with participation from many people from a wide array of backgrounds will allow for a more diverse and effective toolset to engage a trial with, ideally leading to a 'more effective' ruling from the jury.
Ultimately it comes down to the wide variance of educational quality that everyone even within the same society can be impacted by, whether it be due to their own individual actions or those of the municipal, state/provincial, or national actions on the education quality and quantity, it requires active discussion and reflection not only of the choice but the ramifications the choice can have beyond the trial itself.
I tend to agree with the scholars that believe the jury is the 'god of the courtroom', but I am also extremely jaded by my personal experiences with various large groups of people and their seeming willingness to ignore reality to 'fit in' or 'feel better'. The number of times people label me as a pessimist when I'm trying to be objectively realistic is startling and seriously concerning.
Ultimately I would hope people would, with ample reflection, direct their attentions to discovering what the 'right' course of action is, as opposed to the 'moral' or 'easy' choices tend to be.
He has played to selling out canada to corporate interests at every turn and then uses the facade of 'pushing for equality' to shut down any critical discussions in public venues.
Then he shuts down, at the behest of Mr. Buffet, every trucker or rail worker dispute by forcing them back to work and labeling them as 'right wing extremists' for the audacity of asking for time off, reasonable pay, and enough workers to insure safe travels (especially in the rail industry).
Additionally, the liberal government has taken to shutting down bank accounts of people that they accuse, whether with evidence or not, of 'conspiring' against them. We have an entire set of people that used to be mid to mid high class that have lost access to their homes and bank accounts because they opted to support a rail worker protest or a trucker protest that the media had labeled 'extremist'. (Canadian news media is obligated to report the version of events supplied to them by the government or be censured and permanently shut down, this was a good thing in the era of the Iraq war as we were able to know about the lack of WMD's literally years before the US was fully informed, but it is a sword with which the LPC has been stabbing at public criticism and discussion of their continual failures, abuses of power and illegal land sales as well as the use of the RCMP and former US special forces as 'special enforcers' for oil interests)
Instead of allowing any discussion on the matter of their abuse of power and complete lack of oversight of both personal (bribes) and government (missing money) funds, we are assaulted with continual 'us vs them' narratives to split the populace.
Trudeau is Trump light, but objectively more racist.
If you want a TL;DR video about Canada's government issues (with sources)
If we wanted a justice system that didn't waste money, we'd be authoritarian in nature.
The money wasted is to insure 'as even a case' as possible, regardless of the crime.
That's the idea anyway.
I doubt it, I've no interest in discussing the matter with someone who clearly doesn't keep up to date on architectural issues within the mainland.
傻瓜